Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 92.3 | 80.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 11, 10 | -- |
| 2020-08-07 | 2015-08-21 |
| 6.59 x 2.90 x 0.28 inches | 6.03 x 3.00 x 0.30 inches |
| 6.46 ounces | 6.03 ounces |
| Mystic bronze, Mystic gray and Mystic white | Black sapphire, Gold platinum, Silver titan and White pearl |
| Aluminum | Glass and Metal |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 603.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 5.7 inches |
| 2636 x 1080 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| Dynamic AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 425 pixels per inch | 515 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.3 | 8.6 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ SM8250-AB chipset | Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7420 chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 3100 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A57 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 2100 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | Mali-T760 MP8 GPU |
| 9.81 | 9.18 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.3 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | 28.00mm focal length |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 2560 x 1440 (60 fps) (Quad HD / 2K) slow motion video |
| 10.23 | 10.01 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.3 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 5.28 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Galaxy Z Flip 5G is much better than Samsung Galaxy Note5, having a 92.3 score against 80.2. Although the Galaxy Z Flip 5G is a bit heavier than the Samsung Galaxy Note5, it's just a little thinner and notably newer. Galaxy Note5 has a little more vivid screen than Galaxy Z Flip 5G, because although it has a little bit smaller display, it also counts with a just a bit greater pixels density and a bit higher resolution of 1440 x 2560 pixels.
The Galaxy Z Flip 5G has a much greater memory capacity to install applications and games than Galaxy Note5, because it has 192 GB more internal memory capacity. Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 5G counts with a little faster processing unit than Galaxy Note5, and although they both have a Octa-Core processing unit, the Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 5G also has a larger amount of RAM memory.
The Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 5G has just a little bit longer battery performance than Samsung Galaxy Note5, because it has a 10% more battery size. The Galaxy Z Flip 5G captures a bit better pictures and videos than Galaxy Note5, because although it has a back facing camera with lot less MP and a worse 3840x2160 (4K) video quality, it also counts with a larger camera sensor and a bigger aperture.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.