Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 92.3 | 79.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 11, 10 | -- |
| 2020-08-07 | 2016-08-02 |
| 6.59 x 2.90 x 0.28 inches | 6.04 x 2.91 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.46 ounces | 5.96 ounces |
| Mystic bronze, Mystic gray and Mystic white | Black onyx, Blue coral, Gold platinum and Silver titanium |
| Aluminum | -- |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 603.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 5.7 inches |
| 2636 x 1080 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| Dynamic AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 425 pixels per inch | 515 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.3 | 8.5 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ SM8250-AB chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 3100 MHz) processor | Kryo, 64-bit, 14 nm (Quad-Core 2150 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | Adreno 530 GPU |
| 9.81 | 8.91 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 10.78 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.4 inches (1/2.5") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.23 | 9.57 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.1 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3500mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 5.28 | 5.44 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Galaxy Z Flip 5G has a general score of 92.3, which is much better than Samsung Galaxy Note7's 79.5 global score. The Galaxy Z Flip 5G construction is extremely newer and just a little thinner, but just a little heavier than the Samsung Galaxy Note7. Galaxy Note7 counts with a bit more vivid display than Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 5G, because although it has a quite smaller display, it also counts with a just a little greater quantity of pixels in each display inch and a bit higher resolution of 1440 x 2560 pixels.
The Galaxy Z Flip 5G has a way bigger storage to install applications and games than Samsung Galaxy Note7, because although it has no slot for SD memory cards, it also counts with more internal memory capacity. The Galaxy Z Flip 5G has a better performing CPU than Samsung Galaxy Note7, because it has a greater number of faster cores and 4 GB more RAM memory.
The Galaxy Z Flip 5G features just a bit better camera than Samsung Galaxy Note7, because although it has a tinier aperture which is not nice for shooting photos and video in low-light environments and a smaller back camera sensor taking lower quality videos and pictures, and they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video quality and a same resolution camera in the back, the Galaxy Z Flip 5G also counts with higher video frame rate.
The Galaxy Note7 features just a bit better battery lifetime than Galaxy Z Flip 5G, because it has a 3500mAh battery size against 3300mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.