Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 92.3 | 93.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 11, 10 | Android 11, 10, 9.0 Pie |
| 2020-08-07 | 2019-05-16 |
| 6.59 x 2.90 x 0.28 inches | 6.40 x 3.04 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.46 ounces | 6.98 ounces |
| Mystic bronze, Mystic gray and Mystic white | Crown silver, Majestic black and Royal gold |
| Aluminum | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 603.00 | $ 342.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2636 x 1080 pixels | 3040 x 1440 pixels |
| Dynamic AMOLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 425 pixels per inch | 502 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.3 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ SM8250-AB chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 3100 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9.81 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.3 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.23 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4500mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 5.28 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy S10 5G has an overall score of 93.6, which is just a bit better than Galaxy Z Flip 5G's score of 92.3. Both of these devices come with the same Android 11 OS. Although it's the best phone in this comparison review, the Samsung Galaxy S10 5G is an older, just a little bit heavier and a little thicker phone than Galaxy Z Flip 5G.
The Galaxy S10 5G has a bit better looking display than Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 5G, and although they both have a screen with the same size, the Galaxy S10 5G also has a bit higher display pixels density and a better resolution of 1440 x 3040px. The Galaxy Z Flip 5G has a bit superior CPU than Galaxy S10 5G. Both have 8 processing cores and 8 GB of RAM.
The Galaxy S10 5G and Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 5G count with incredibly similar cameras, and although the Galaxy S10 5G has a larger diafragm aperture to take better low light captures and videos, they both have a 0.39 inches back camera sensor, the same 3840x2160 video definition, the same resolution camera and the same 60 fps video frame rate.
Galaxy S10 5G's storage capacity for games and applications is very similar to the Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 5G one, both have exactly the same 256 GB internal storage. The Samsung Galaxy S10 5G counts with better battery duration than Galaxy Z Flip 5G, because it has a 4500mAh battery size instead of 3300mAh.
In addition to being the best phone of the ones we are comparing, Galaxy S10 5G is also a bargain compared to others, making it a no doubt choice.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.