Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 92.3 | 95.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 11, 10 | Android 13, 12 |
| 2020-08-07 | 2022-02-25 |
| 6.59 x 2.90 x 0.28 inches | 6.43 x 3.07 x 0.35 inches |
| 6.46 ounces | 8.08 ounces |
| Mystic bronze, Mystic gray and Mystic white | Burgundy, Green, Phantom Black and White |
| Aluminum | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass Victus) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 603.00 | $ 1200.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.8 inches |
| 2636 x 1080 pixels | 3088 x 1440 pixels |
| Dynamic AMOLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 425 pixels per inch | 501 pixels per inch |
| -- | 1750 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.3 | 9.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ SM8250-AB chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 SM8450 (4 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 3100 MHz) processor | Quad-Core 2800 MHz + Quad-Core 1800 MHz processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | Adreno 730 GPU |
| 9.81 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.3 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP | 108.00 MP + 40.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | 23.00mm focal length |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.75 inches (1/1.33") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.23 | 13.75 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 5.28 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Galaxy S22 Ultra is a bit better than the Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 5G, with a global score of 95.4 against 92.3. Both of these devices come with Android OS (operating system), but Galaxy S22 Ultra has 13 version and Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 5G has Android 11 version, so it provides the user a couple additional features. Galaxy S22 Ultra's body is newer than the Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 5G's, although it is thicker and incredibly heavier.
The Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 5G counts with just a little better hardware performance than Galaxy S22 Ultra. Both of them have 8 CPU cores and a 8 GB RAM. Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra counts with a better looking screen than Galaxy Z Flip 5G, because it has a little bigger screen, a quite better pixel number per display inch and a higher 1440 x 3088 resolution.
The Galaxy Z Flip 5G has a much greater storage for applications, games, photos and videos than Galaxy S22 Ultra, because it has 128 GB more internal memory. Galaxy S22 Ultra counts with a really longer battery lifetime than Galaxy Z Flip 5G, because it has a 5000mAh battery capacity against 3300mAh.
The Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra shoots a lot better pictures and videos than Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 5G, and although they both have the same aperture, the Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra also has a back-facing camera with way more megapixels, a lot higher 7680x4320 video definition and a much bigger sensor.
Although Galaxy S22 Ultra is a better device, it costs a lot more money than Galaxy Z Flip 5G, and it doesn't have such a good quality/price relation as Galaxy Z Flip 5G. If you prefer to save some money, you can buy Galaxy Z Flip 5G, giving up a couple features and specs, but you will get the most with your budget.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.