Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 92.3 | 76 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 11, 10 | Android 14 |
| 2020-08-07 | -- |
| 6.59 x 2.90 x 0.28 inches | 6.38 x 3.04 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.46 ounces | 7.51 ounces |
| Mystic bronze, Mystic gray and Mystic white | Blue, Graphite, Gray, Mint and Yellow |
| Aluminum | Aluminum and Glass |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 603.00 | $ 650.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2636 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| Dynamic AMOLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 425 pixels per inch | 385 pixels per inch |
| -- | 1900 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.3 | 9.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ SM8250-AB chipset | Exynos 2400e (4 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 3100 MHz) processor | processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | Xclipse 940 GPU |
| 9.81 | 6.21 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.3 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | 24.00mm focal length |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | -- |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.23 | 9.35 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4700mAh Nano SIM Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.28 | 6.56 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.3 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Galaxy Z Flip 5G is way better than the Samsung Galaxy S24 FE, getting a 92.3 score against 76. Both phones in this review have Android operating system, but Galaxy Z Flip 5G has an older 11 version and Samsung Galaxy S24 FE has Android 14 version. Galaxy Z Flip 5G is a just a little thinner and somewhat lighter cellphone than Samsung Galaxy S24 FE.
The Galaxy Z Flip 5G has a much better performing processing unit than Galaxy S24 FE, and although they both have the same RAM amount, the Galaxy Z Flip 5G also has 7 more processing cores. Galaxy S24 FE counts with a better display than Galaxy Z Flip 5G, although it has a little lower resolution of 1080 x 2340 and a just a little lower pixels count per display inch, they both have a screen with the same size.
Galaxy Z Flip 5G counts with a lot bigger memory to store more apps and games than Galaxy S24 FE, because it has 256 GB internal storage capacity. Galaxy Z Flip 5G shoots clearer photos and videos than Samsung Galaxy S24 FE, although it has a camera in the back with a much lower resolution, they both have the same camera aperture.
The Samsung Galaxy S24 FE counts with a very superior battery life than Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 5G, because it has a 4700mAh battery capacity instead of 3300mAh.
Galaxy Z Flip 5G not only is the best phones in our comparison, but it's also a bit cheaper, making this phone a simple decision.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.