Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 92.3 | 82.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 11, 10 | Android 14 |
| 2020-08-07 | -- |
| 6.59 x 2.90 x 0.28 inches | -- |
| 6.46 ounces | -- |
| Mystic bronze, Mystic gray and Mystic white | -- |
| Aluminum | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass Victus 2) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 603.00 | $ 800.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.2 inches |
| 2636 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| Dynamic AMOLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 425 pixels per inch | 416 pixels per inch |
| -- | 2600 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.3 | 9.7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ SM8250-AB chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 4 chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 3100 MHz) processor | processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | Yes GPU |
| 9.81 | 6.21 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.3 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 12.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | 24.00mm focal length |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.64 inches (1/1.56") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.23 | 12.54 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 5.28 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.3 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 5G has a global score of 92.3, which is much better than Galaxy S25's 82.6 global score. Both phones in our current comparison have Android OS (operating system), but Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 5G has 11 version while Galaxy S25 has Android 14. Galaxy S25 has a more vivid screen than Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 5G, although it has a little lower 1080 x 2340 resolution, a just a bit less pixels per inch of screen and a quite smaller display.
Galaxy Z Flip 5G counts with a very superior memory capacity to install games and applications than Samsung Galaxy S25, because it has 256 GB internal memory capacity. The Galaxy Z Flip 5G counts with a much better performing processing unit than Samsung Galaxy S25. They have the same RAM memory amount and the same number of cores.
Galaxy S25 features better battery performance than Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 5G, because it has a 4000mAh battery capacity against 3300mAh. Samsung Galaxy S25 captures way better videos and photos than Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 5G, and although they both have a same size diafragm aperture, the Samsung Galaxy S25 also has a way more MP back camera, a way better 7680x4320 video quality and a way bigger sensor providing a way higher image quality.
The Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 5G is not only the best phones in our comparison, but it's also by far the cheapest, making this phone an obvious call.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.