Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 92.3 | 77.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 11, 10 | Android 4.4.2 |
| 2020-08-07 | 2014-06-23 |
| 6.59 x 2.90 x 0.28 inches | 5.67 x 2.91 x 0.35 inches |
| 6.46 ounces | 5.57 ounces |
| Mystic bronze, Mystic gray and Mystic white | Blue and Red |
| Aluminum | -- |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 603.00 | $ 299.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 5.1 inches |
| 2636 x 1080 pixels | 1080 x 1920 pixels (Full HD) |
| Dynamic AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 425 pixels per inch | 432 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | Capacitive, Multi-touch |
| 8.3 | 9.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ SM8250-AB chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 801 MSM8974-AC chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 3100 MHz) processor | Krait 400 (Quad-Core 2500 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 2 GB (800 MHz) RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | Adreno 330 (450 MHz) GPU |
| 9.81 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 16 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 6.72 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 2.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/2.20 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.23 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA, UMTS, EDGE, GPRS and GSM |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | SIM |
| 10.7 | 7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 2800mAh Li-Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| -- | 390 hours standby time 21 hours talk time |
| 5.28 | 4.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.0, EDR |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 5G has a general score of 92.3, which is much better than the Galaxy S5 Sport's overall score of 77.8. Both of these phones include Android OS (Operating System), but Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 5G has the older 11 version while Galaxy S5 Sport has Android 4.4.2 version. Although the Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 5G is heavier than the Galaxy S5 Sport, it's thinner and extremely newer.
Galaxy Z Flip 5G features a bit superior processing unit than Samsung Galaxy S5 Sport, because although it has doesn't have a graphics processor, it also counts with a greater number of cores (and also faster) and more RAM. The Samsung Galaxy S5 Sport counts with a slightly better looking screen than Galaxy Z Flip 5G, because although it has a lot smaller display and a quite lower resolution of 1920 x 1080px, it also counts with a bit better pixels count in each inch in the display.
The Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 5G has a much greater storage capacity for games and applications than Samsung Galaxy S5 Sport, because although it has no SD memory card expansion slot, it also counts with 256 GB internal storage. The Galaxy Z Flip 5G has greater battery life than Samsung Galaxy S5 Sport, because it has an 18% larger battery size.
The Galaxy Z Flip 5G shoots just a bit better photographs and videos than Samsung Galaxy S5 Sport, because although it has a way less mega pixels back-facing camera and a lower video quality, it also counts with a bigger diafragm aperture to take better low-light images and video and a larger sensor capturing higher quality videos and photographs.
The Galaxy Z Flip 5G costs a lot more money than the Samsung Galaxy S5 Sport, but it's still a great choice, because you can get a better phone for that extra money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.