Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 92.3 | 79.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 11, 10 | -- |
| 2020-08-07 | 2016-03-11 |
| 6.59 x 2.90 x 0.28 inches | 5.61 x 2.74 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.46 ounces | 5.36 ounces |
| Mystic bronze, Mystic gray and Mystic white | Black, Gold, Pink, Pink gold, Silver and White |
| Aluminum | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 4) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 603.00 | $ 124.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 5.1 inches |
| 2636 x 1080 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| Dynamic AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 425 pixels per inch | 576 pixels per inch |
| -- | 855 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.3 | 9.6 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ SM8250-AB chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 3100 MHz) processor | Kryo, 64-bit, 14 nm (Quad-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | Adreno 530 GPU |
| 9.81 | 9 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 32 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 200 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 8.56 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.4 inches (1/2.5") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.23 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 5.28 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Galaxy Z Flip 5G has a global score of 92.3, which is much better than Galaxy S7's 79.5 score. Even though the Galaxy Z Flip 5G is somewhat heavier than Galaxy S7, it's just a little bit thinner and noticeably newer. Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 5G has a bit superior CPU than Galaxy S7, because it has a larger number of cores (and faster) and 4 GB more RAM memory.
Galaxy S7 counts with a better looking display than Galaxy Z Flip 5G, because although it has a really smaller screen, it also counts with a greater pixels density and a slightly higher 1440 x 2560px resolution. The Galaxy Z Flip 5G shoots slightly better videos and photos than Samsung Galaxy S7, because although it has a smaller aperture which is not good for taking images and/or video in low light situations and a smaller sensor which offers a worse image and video quality, and they both have a 12 mega-pixels resolution back camera and the same 3840x2160 video quality, the Galaxy Z Flip 5G also counts with faster 60 fps video frame rate.
The Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 5G counts with a very superior memory capacity for apps and games than Galaxy S7, because although it has no slot for SD memory cards, it also counts with 256 GB internal memory capacity. The Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 5G counts with a little longer battery life than Samsung Galaxy S7, because it has a 3300mAh battery capacity.
Although Galaxy Z Flip 5G is a better device, it is a lot more expensive than Galaxy S7, and it doesn't have such a good quality/price relation as Galaxy S7. So if you want that extra features, you can buy the Galaxy Z Flip 5G, otherwise you can save some dollars and buy the Galaxy S7, giving up a couple specs and features.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.