Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 92.3 | 75.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 11, 10 | -- |
| 2020-08-07 | 2016-06-10 |
| 6.59 x 2.90 x 0.28 inches | 5.86 x 2.95 x 0.39 inches |
| 6.46 ounces | 6.53 ounces |
| Mystic bronze, Mystic gray and Mystic white | Camo green, Sandy gold and Titanium gray |
| Aluminum | Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 603.00 | $ 247.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 5.1 inches |
| 2636 x 1080 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| Dynamic AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 425 pixels per inch | 576 pixels per inch |
| -- | 500 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.3 | 9.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ SM8250-AB chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 3100 MHz) processor | Kryo, 64-bit, 14 nm (Quad-Core 2150 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | Adreno 530 GPU |
| 9.81 | 8.91 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 32 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 200 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 8.56 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.23 | 9.46 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | -- |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | HSPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 3 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 5.28 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 5G has a general score of 92.3, which is way better than the Samsung Galaxy S7 Active's overall score of 75.8. The Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 5G body is notably newer, a lot thinner and a little bit lighter than Samsung Galaxy S7 Active. The Samsung Galaxy S7 Active counts with a better display than Galaxy Z Flip 5G, because although it has a lot smaller display, it also counts with a better pixel density and a quite better 1440 x 2560 resolution.
The Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 5G has a better processing unit than Galaxy S7 Active, because it has more RAM memory and a higher number of cores. Galaxy Z Flip 5G features a slightly better camera than Galaxy S7 Active, because although it has a tinier aperture, and they both have the same 3840x2160 video quality and a same resolution camera, the Galaxy Z Flip 5G also counts with higher video frame rates.
Galaxy Z Flip 5G counts with a very superior storage capacity to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Galaxy S7 Active, because although it has no external memory card slot, it also counts with 256 GB internal storage capacity. The Galaxy S7 Active has longer battery lifetime than Galaxy Z Flip 5G, because it has 4000mAh of battery capacity against 3300mAh.
Galaxy Z Flip 5G costs a lot more than Samsung Galaxy S7 Active, but it's still a convenient choice, because you can get a much better phone for that extra money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.