Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 92.3 | 80.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 11, 10 | Android 8.0 Oreo |
| 2020-08-07 | 2020-04-04 |
| 6.59 x 2.90 x 0.28 inches | 6.24 x 3.18 x 0.56 inches |
| 6.46 ounces | 9.03 ounces |
| Mystic bronze, Mystic gray and Mystic white | Black |
| Aluminum | Plastic |
| $ 603.00 | $ 1105.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 5.1 inches |
| 2636 x 1080 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| Dynamic AMOLED | -- |
| 425 pixels per inch | 576 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.3 | 8.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ SM8250-AB chipset | Samsung Exynos 9810 chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 3100 MHz) processor | Exynos M3 and ARM Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2700 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | Mali-G72 MP18 GPU |
| 9.81 | 9.45 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.23 | 8.14 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.28 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Galaxy Z Flip 5G has a general score of 92.3, which is much better than the Galaxy XCover FieldPro's 80.1 score. Galaxy Z Flip 5G is a much lighter and notably thinner cellphone than the Galaxy XCover FieldPro, even though both were released only a couple months apart. Both phones we compare here have Android OS, but the Galaxy Z Flip 5G has the older 11 version and Galaxy XCover FieldPro has Android 8.0 Oreo version.
The Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro features a little sharper display than Galaxy Z Flip 5G, because although it has a lot smaller screen, it also counts with a slightly better 1440 x 2560 resolution and more pixels per screen inch. Galaxy Z Flip 5G counts with a better storage capacity to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Galaxy XCover FieldPro, because although it has no SD card slot, it also counts with 256 GB internal storage.
Galaxy Z Flip 5G features a bit faster CPU than Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro, and although they both have 8 processing cores, the Galaxy Z Flip 5G also has a larger amount of RAM memory. Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro features longer battery performance than Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 5G, because it has 4500mAh of battery capacity against 3300mAh.
The Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 5G counts with a much better camera than Galaxy XCover FieldPro, because although it has a tinier diafragm aperture which is not favorable for low light captures and videos, and they both have a same resolution back facing camera and a 0.39 inches sensor, the Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 5G also counts with a much better 3840x2160 (4K) video resolution.
Despite of being the best phone between the ones we are comparing, Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 5G is also a bargain compared to the other phones.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.