Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 92.3 | 81 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 11, 10 | Android 11, 10 |
| 2020-08-07 | 2020-01-31 |
| 6.59 x 2.90 x 0.28 inches | 6.30 x 3.02 x 0.39 inches |
| 6.46 ounces | 7.76 ounces |
| Mystic bronze, Mystic gray and Mystic white | Black |
| Aluminum | -- |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 603.00 | $ 421.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.3 inches |
| 2636 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| Dynamic AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 425 pixels per inch | 409 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.3 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ SM8250-AB chipset | Samsung Exynos 9611 chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 3100 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | Mali-G72 MP3 GPU |
| 9.81 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP | 25.00 MP + 13.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.25 inches (1/4") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (480 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.23 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4050mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.28 | 6 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 5G is much better than the Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro, with a 92.3 score against 81. The Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 5G is a a lot thinner and lighter phone than Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro, even when they were only released 6 months apart. These phones have the same Android 11 OS (Operating System).
Galaxy Z Flip 5G features a bit better processing power than Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Galaxy Z Flip 5G also has a larger amount of RAM memory. Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 5G has a little more vivid screen than Galaxy XCover Pro, because it has a bit bigger screen, a slightly better resolution of 1080 x 2636 pixels and a little greater pixel number per inch of display.
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 5G shoots clearer videos and photos than Galaxy XCover Pro, because although it has a smaller diafragm aperture and a lot worse resolution back camera, it also counts with a lot better video resolution and a much bigger camera sensor. Galaxy Z Flip 5G has a quite bigger memory capacity to store more games and applications than Galaxy XCover Pro, because although it has no slot for external memory cards, it also counts with 256 GB internal storage capacity.
The Galaxy XCover Pro has better battery life than Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 5G, because it has 4050mAh of battery capacity against 3300mAh.
The Galaxy Z Flip 5G is a lot more expensive than the Galaxy XCover Pro, but you can get a better phone for that extra money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.