Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 92.3 | 85.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 11, 10 | Android 11 |
| 2020-08-07 | 2021-08-11 |
| 6.59 x 2.90 x 0.28 inches | 6.54 x 2.84 x 0.27 inches |
| 6.46 ounces | 6.46 ounces |
| Mystic bronze, Mystic gray and Mystic white | Cream, Lavender and Phantom Black |
| Aluminum | Aluminum and Glass |
| $ 603.00 | $ 1000.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2636 x 1080 pixels | 2636 x 1080 pixels |
| Dynamic AMOLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 425 pixels per inch | 425 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.3 | 8.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ SM8250-AB chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 SM8350 chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 3100 MHz) processor | Kryo 680, 64-bit, 5 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | Adreno 660 GPU |
| 9.81 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.3 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | -- |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.23 | 7.92 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3300mAh Nano SIM Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.28 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 5G is a bit better than the Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 3, getting a 92.3 score against 85.6. Both devices in our current comparison include the same Android 11 operating system. The Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 5G body weights the same than the Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 3, but it is a little thicker.
Galaxy Z Flip 3 counts with a display that is just as good as Galaxy Z Flip 5G's display, they have the same pixels density, the same exact resolution of 1080 x 2636px and a display with the same size. Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 5G counts with much more storage for apps and games than Galaxy Z Flip 3, because it has 256 GB internal memory capacity.
Galaxy Z Flip 5G features a bit faster processing unit than Galaxy Z Flip 3. Both have the same number of cores and 8 GB of RAM memory. The Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 5G features a much better camera than Galaxy Z Flip 3. They have a same size aperture and a 12 mega-pixels back camera. Galaxy Z Flip 3 features a battery performance that is very similar to Galaxy Z Flip 5G's battery duration.
The Galaxy Z Flip 5G not only is the best devices in this comparison, but it's also a bargain compared to others.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.