Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 92.3 | 79 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Sony |
| Android 11, 10 | Android 8.0 Oreo |
| 2020-08-07 | 2018-04-05 |
| 6.59 x 2.90 x 0.28 inches | 5.31 x 2.56 x 0.48 inches |
| 6.46 ounces | 5.93 ounces |
| Mystic bronze, Mystic gray and Mystic white | 16 777 216 |
| Aluminum | Aluminum and Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 603.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 5 inches |
| 2636 x 1080 pixels | 2160 x 1080 pixels |
| Dynamic AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 425 pixels per inch | 483 pixels per inch |
| -- | 700 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.3 | 9.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ SM8250-AB chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 3100 MHz) processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 9.81 | 9.54 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 400 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 11.34 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP | 19.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | 25.00mm focal length |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (960 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.23 | 10.67 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 2870mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.28 | 4.88 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Galaxy Z Flip 5G has a global score of 92.3, which is much better than Sony Xperia XZ2 Compact's 79 score. Galaxy Z Flip 5G is a noticeably newer and thinner cellphone than the Sony Xperia XZ2 Compact, but it is a little heavier. Both phones we are comparing here come with Android OS (Operating System), but Galaxy Z Flip 5G has an older 11 version and Sony Xperia XZ2 Compact has Android 8.0 Oreo version.
Xperia XZ2 Compact counts with a bit more vivid screen than Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 5G, because although it has a bit lower 1080 x 2160 resolution and a really smaller screen, it also counts with a just a little better display density. The Galaxy Z Flip 5G has just a little better performance than Sony Xperia XZ2 Compact, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Galaxy Z Flip 5G also has 4 GB more RAM memory.
The Sony Xperia XZ2 Compact shoots a little bit better videos and photos than Galaxy Z Flip 5G, because although it has a tinier aperture which is not nice for low light images, and they both have the same video resolution and the same video frame rate, the Sony Xperia XZ2 Compact also counts with a larger back camera sensor which offers a higher photo and video quality and a lot more MP camera.
The Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 5G features a greater memory capacity to install games and applications than Xperia XZ2 Compact, because although it has no SD extension slot, it also counts with more internal memory. Galaxy Z Flip 5G features a bit superior battery performance than Xperia XZ2 Compact, because it has a 3300mAh battery capacity against 2870mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.