Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 92.3 | 82.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Sony |
| Android 11, 10 | -- |
| 2020-08-07 | 2018-07-30 |
| 6.59 x 2.90 x 0.28 inches | 6.22 x 3.15 x 0.47 inches |
| 6.46 ounces | 8.32 ounces |
| Mystic bronze, Mystic gray and Mystic white | 16 777 216 |
| Aluminum | Aluminum and Glass |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 603.00 | $ 1000.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 5.8 inches |
| 2636 x 1080 pixels | 3840 x 2160 pixels (4K) |
| Dynamic AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 425 pixels per inch | 760 pixels per inch |
| -- | 900 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.3 | 10.4 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ SM8250-AB chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 3100 MHz) processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 9.81 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 400 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 11.34 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP | 19.00 MP + 13.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | 25.00mm focal length |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (960 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.23 | 10.45 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3540mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 5.28 | 5.52 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Galaxy Z Flip 5G is much better than the Xperia XZ2 Premium, with a 92.3 score against 82.2. The Galaxy Z Flip 5G is a notably newer device, and it's also way lighter and much thinner than Xperia XZ2 Premium. Sony Xperia XZ2 Premium features a way better screen than Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 5G, because although it has a quite smaller screen, it also counts with a much better display density and a much better resolution of 2160 x 3840px.
Galaxy Z Flip 5G features a greater storage for apps and games than Xperia XZ2 Premium, because although it has no external memory slot, it also counts with 256 GB internal memory. The Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 5G has a little better performance than Xperia XZ2 Premium, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 5G also has more RAM memory.
The Sony Xperia XZ2 Premium counts with a slightly better camera than Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 5G, because although it has slower 30 frames per second video frame rate, and they both have a same size diafragm aperture and the same 3840x2160 video resolution, the Sony Xperia XZ2 Premium also counts with a bigger sensor and a much more MP back facing camera.
Xperia XZ2 Premium has a bit better battery lifetime than Galaxy Z Flip 5G, because it has a 7 percent greater battery size.
Even being the best phone of the ones we are comparing, the Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 5G is also by far the cheapest, making this phone a no doubt choice.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.