Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 92.3 | 77.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Sony |
| Android 11, 10 | -- |
| 2020-08-07 | 2017-04-05 |
| 6.59 x 2.90 x 0.28 inches | 5.75 x 2.83 x 0.32 inches |
| 6.46 ounces | 5.68 ounces |
| Mystic bronze, Mystic gray and Mystic white | Black, Blue and Silver |
| Aluminum | Metal |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 603.00 | $ 700.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 5.2 inches |
| 2636 x 1080 pixels | 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) |
| Dynamic AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 425 pixels per inch | 424 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.3 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ SM8250-AB chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 3100 MHz) processor | Kryo, 64-bit (Quad-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | Adreno 530 GPU |
| 9.81 | 9 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 32 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 8.88 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP | 19.00 MP + 13.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | 25.00mm focal length |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (960 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.23 | 12.87 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | -- |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.1 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 2900mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.28 | 4.88 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Galaxy Z Flip 5G has a global score of 92.3, which is much better than Xperia XZs's 77.2 general score. The Galaxy Z Flip 5G construction is incredibly newer and thinner than the Xperia XZs's, but it is also heavier. Galaxy Z Flip 5G has a bit more powerful processing unit than Sony Xperia XZs, because it has a larger amount of RAM memory and more cores.
The Galaxy Z Flip 5G has a bit sharper screen than Sony Xperia XZs, because it has a larger display, a quite better 1080 x 2636 resolution and a little bit greater pixels density. The Sony Xperia XZs captures much clearer pictures and videos than Galaxy Z Flip 5G, because although it has a smaller diafragm aperture which is not recommended for taking images in low light situations, and they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video definition, the Sony Xperia XZs also counts with a bigger back-facing camera sensor providing a higher image quality, faster video frame rate and a much more mega pixels back-facing camera.
Galaxy Z Flip 5G features a very superior storage for games and applications than Sony Xperia XZs, because although it has no external memory card slot, it also counts with more internal memory. Galaxy Z Flip 5G counts with a bit longer battery performance than Sony Xperia XZs, because it has a 14% larger battery capacity.
Galaxy Z Flip 5G is not only the best phones of the ones we are comparing, but it's also the cheapest one.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.