Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 92.3 | 78.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Sony |
| Android 11, 10 | Android 5.1 |
| 2020-08-07 | 2015-06-16 |
| 6.59 x 2.90 x 0.28 inches | 5.69 x 2.85 x 0.34 inches |
| 6.46 ounces | 5.64 ounces |
| Mystic bronze, Mystic gray and Mystic white | Black and White |
| Aluminum | Glass and Metal |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 603.00 | $ 249.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 5.2 inches |
| 2636 x 1080 pixels | 1440 x 2560 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| Dynamic AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 425 pixels per inch | 565 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | Capacitive, Multi-touch |
| 8.3 | 9.7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ SM8250-AB chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 810 MSM8994 chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 3100 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A57 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 3 GB (1600 MHz) RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | Adreno 430 (600 MHz) GPU |
| 9.81 | 9.45 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 32 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 8.12 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP | 20.70 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | 25.00mm focal length |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.23 | 10.45 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 7.2 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3000mAh Li-Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 5.28 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 5G has a score of 92.3, which is better than Sony Xperia Z4v's 78.8 global score. Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 5G's design is incredibly newer and thinner, but also heavier than the Sony Xperia Z4v. Both of these phones use Android operating system, but the Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 5G has a more recent 11 version while Sony Xperia Z4v has Android 5.1.
Xperia Z4v features a brighter screen than Galaxy Z Flip 5G, because although it has a lot smaller display, it also counts with a little bit higher 2560 x 1440 resolution and a better pixels amount in each inch in the display. The Galaxy Z Flip 5G features a little bit better hardware performance than Xperia Z4v, because although it has doesn't have an extra graphics co-processor, and they both have the same number of cores, the Galaxy Z Flip 5G also counts with a higher amount of RAM.
Galaxy Z Flip 5G counts with a lot bigger storage to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Xperia Z4v, because although it has no SD extension slot, it also counts with more internal storage capacity. The Xperia Z4v features a slightly better camera than Galaxy Z Flip 5G, because although it has a smaller camera aperture which is worse for shooting images and/or video in poorly lited environments and worse video frame rates, and they both have the same video quality, the Xperia Z4v also counts with a back-facing camera with a lot better resolution and a larger camera sensor.
The Galaxy Z Flip 5G has a bit longer battery life than Sony Xperia Z4v, because it has 3300mAh of battery capacity.
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 5G costs a lot more money than Sony Xperia Z4v, but you can get a better phone for that extra dollars.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.