Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 92.3 | 77.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Sony |
| Android 11, 10 | Android 5.1 |
| 2020-08-07 | 2015-09-02 |
| 6.59 x 2.90 x 0.28 inches | 5.75 x 2.83 x 0.29 inches |
| 6.46 ounces | 5.43 ounces |
| Mystic bronze, Mystic gray and Mystic white | Black, Gold, Green and White |
| Aluminum | Glass and Metal |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 603.00 | $ 409.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 5.2 inches |
| 2636 x 1080 pixels | 1080 x 1920 pixels (Full HD) |
| Dynamic AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 425 pixels per inch | 424 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | Capacitive, Multi-touch |
| 8.3 | 9.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ SM8250-AB chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 810 MSM8994 chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 3100 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A57 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 3 GB (1600 MHz) RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | Adreno 430 (450 MHz) GPU |
| 9.81 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 32 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC (up to 200 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 8.56 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP | 23.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | 24.00mm focal length |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (60 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.23 | 10.56 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA, EDGE, GPRS and GSM |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 7.1 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 2900mAh Li-Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| -- | 520 hours standby time 13.2 hours talk time |
| 5.28 | 4.88 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 5G is better than the Xperia Z5, having a 92.3 score against 77.6. Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 5G is a a lot newer and a little bit thinner cellphone than Xperia Z5, but it is also somewhat heavier. Both devices in our current comparison include Android OS (Operating System), but Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 5G has 11 version and Xperia Z5 has Android 5.1 version.
Xperia Z5 features a little sharper screen than Galaxy Z Flip 5G, although it has a lot smaller screen, a quite lower 1920 x 1080 pixels resolution and a just a bit inferior number of pixels per display inch. Galaxy Z Flip 5G counts with a very superior storage capacity for applications and games than Xperia Z5, because although it has no external SD slot, it also counts with 256 GB internal memory.
Galaxy Z Flip 5G features a bit better processing power than Sony Xperia Z5, because although it has doesn't have a graphics co-processor, and they both have a Octa-Core processing unit, the Galaxy Z Flip 5G also counts with 5 GB more RAM memory. Sony Xperia Z5 features a little bit better camera than Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 5G, because although it has slower video frame rates, and they both have a F1.8 camera aperture and the same 3840x2160 (4K) video definition, the Sony Xperia Z5 also counts with a much better resolution back camera and a larger sensor.
The Galaxy Z Flip 5G has just a little bit longer battery lifetime than Sony Xperia Z5, because it has a 14% bigger battery size.
Galaxy Z Flip 5G costs a lot more money than Xperia Z5, but it's still a great deal, as you can get a much better phone for that extra money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.