Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 92.3 | 76.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| Android 11, 10 | Android 11 |
| 2020-08-07 | 2021-04-20 |
| 6.59 x 2.90 x 0.28 inches | 6.46 x 2.87 x 0.36 inches |
| 6.46 ounces | 6.70 ounces |
| Mystic bronze, Mystic gray and Mystic white | Marine Blue and Moondust Gray |
| Aluminum | Glass |
| $ 603.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2636 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Dynamic AMOLED | AMOLED |
| 425 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.3 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ SM8250-AB chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G SM7225 chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 3100 MHz) processor | Kryo 570, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | Adreno 619 GPU |
| 9.81 | 9.18 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 18.62 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.23 | 11.55 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4500mAh Nano SIM Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 5.28 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy Z Flip 5G is much better than TCL 20 Pro 5G, with a 92.3 score against 76.1. These phones have the same Android 11 OS (Operating System), so you shouldn't notice any difference regarding that. The Galaxy Z Flip 5G body is way thinner and a little lighter than TCL 20 Pro 5G, even when both were only released 9 months apart.
The Galaxy Z Flip 5G counts with a little sharper screen than TCL 20 Pro 5G, and although they both have a display of the same size, the Galaxy Z Flip 5G also has a bit higher resolution of 1080 x 2636 pixels and a little better quantity of pixels per inch of screen. TCL 20 Pro 5G counts with a much bigger storage capacity to install games and applications than Galaxy Z Flip 5G, and although they both have exactly the same internal memory, the TCL 20 Pro 5G also has a slot for an SD memory card that allows up to 1 TB.
The Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 5G features a bit more powerful processor than TCL 20 Pro 5G, and although they both have 8 CPU cores, the Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 5G also has a greater amount of RAM memory. TCL 20 Pro 5G has greater battery life than Galaxy Z Flip 5G, because it has a 36% greater battery capacity.
The TCL 20 Pro 5G takes much better photographs and videos than Galaxy Z Flip 5G, because although it has lower video frame rate, and they both have a same size aperture and the same 3840x2160 (4K) video definition, the TCL 20 Pro 5G also counts with a much more megapixels back-facing camera and a way bigger back camera sensor providing a lot better image quality.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.