Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 92.3 | 80.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Xiaomi |
| Android 11, 10 | Android 9.0 Pie, 8.1 Oreo |
| 2020-08-07 | 2018-04-20 |
| 6.59 x 2.90 x 0.28 inches | 6.36 x 2.97 x 0.36 inches |
| 6.46 ounces | 6.70 ounces |
| Mystic bronze, Mystic gray and Mystic white | Black, Blue and Gray |
| Aluminum | -- |
| $ 603.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6 inches |
| 2636 x 1080 pixels | 2160 x 1080 pixels |
| Dynamic AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 425 pixels per inch | 402 pixels per inch |
| -- | 550 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.3 | 8.5 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ SM8250-AB chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 3100 MHz) processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 9.81 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.3 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 20.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.34 inches (1/2.9") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.23 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.28 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Galaxy Z Flip 5G is better than the Xiaomi Black Shark, with a 92.3 score against 80.4. Galaxy Z Flip 5G's construction is way newer, just a little lighter and incredibly thinner than the Xiaomi Black Shark. Both of these devices use Android operating system, but the Galaxy Z Flip 5G has the previous 11 version and Xiaomi Black Shark has Android 9.0 Pie version.
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 5G counts with just a bit better processing power than Xiaomi Black Shark. Both have the same RAM memory amount and a Octa-Core CPU. The Xiaomi Black Shark counts with just a bit better looking screen than Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 5G, although it has a quite worse pixels quantity per inch of display, a little worse resolution of 1080 x 2160px and a little smaller screen.
Galaxy Z Flip 5G features much more storage for applications, games, photos and videos than Xiaomi Black Shark, because it has 256 GB internal memory. The Xiaomi Black Shark has superior battery life than Galaxy Z Flip 5G, because it has 4000mAh of battery capacity. The Galaxy Z Flip 5G takes slightly better photographs and videos than Xiaomi Black Shark, and although they both have a same size aperture, the same (4K) video definition and a back camera with a 12 megapixels, the Galaxy Z Flip 5G also has a larger sensor providing a better image quality and faster video frame rates.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.