Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 92.3 | 90.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Xiaomi |
| Android 11, 10 | Android 10 |
| 2020-08-07 | 2020-05-08 |
| 6.59 x 2.90 x 0.28 inches | 7.00 x 3.28 x 0.40 inches |
| 6.46 ounces | 7.83 ounces |
| Mystic bronze, Mystic gray and Mystic white | Blasting black |
| Aluminum | Aluminum and Aluminum |
| $ 603.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 7.1 inches |
| 2636 x 1080 pixels | 3120 x 1440 pixels |
| Dynamic AMOLED | AMOLED |
| 425 pixels per inch | 484 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.3 | 8.6 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ SM8250-AB chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 3100 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 9.81 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.3 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 20.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.23 | 12.43 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.28 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 5G has a general score of 92.3, which is a little bit better than Xiaomi Black Shark 3 Pro's general score of 90.1. Even when the Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 5G and the Xiaomi Black Shark 3 Pro were only released 3 months apart, the Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 5G is lighter and notably thinner. Both of these phones work with Android OS, but Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 5G has a newer 11 version while Xiaomi Black Shark 3 Pro has Android 10 version, offering a lot of extra features.
The Xiaomi Black Shark 3 Pro features a slightly better screen than Galaxy Z Flip 5G, because it has a little bit larger screen, a higher resolution of 1440 x 3120 pixels and a bit better pixels number per display inch. The Galaxy Z Flip 5G features a bit faster processing unit than Xiaomi Black Shark 3 Pro. Both have a Octa-Core CPU and a 8 GB RAM.
The Xiaomi Black Shark 3 Pro shoots greater photos and videos than Galaxy Z Flip 5G, and although they both have the same video quality, the same camera aperture and the same video frame rate, the Xiaomi Black Shark 3 Pro also has a much larger sensor and a back camera with a way higher 64 MP resolution.
The Xiaomi Black Shark 3 Pro counts with as much storage capacity to install applications and games or saving photos and videos as the Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 5G one, they have the same internal storage. Xiaomi Black Shark 3 Pro counts with a much longer battery duration than Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 5G, because it has a 52 percent more battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.