Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 92.3 | 81.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Xiaomi |
| Android 11, 10 | Android 10 |
| 2020-08-07 | 2020-10-13 |
| 6.59 x 2.90 x 0.28 inches | 6.51 x 3.02 x 0.35 inches |
| 6.46 ounces | 7.57 ounces |
| Mystic bronze, Mystic gray and Mystic white | Atlantic blue, Pearl gray and Rose gold |
| Aluminum | Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) and Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 603.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2636 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Dynamic AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 425 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.3 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ SM8250-AB chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G SM7225 chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 3100 MHz) processor | Kryo 570, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | Adreno 619 GPU |
| 9.81 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.3 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.23 | 10.34 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4820mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.28 | 6.64 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 5G has an overall score of 92.3, which is better than Xiaomi Mi 10T Lite's general score of 81.2. Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 5G's design is somewhat thinner and lighter than Xiaomi Mi 10T Lite, even though they were released only 2 months apart. Both phones we are comparing here work with Android OS (operating system), but Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 5G has a newer 11 version while Xiaomi Mi 10T Lite has Android 10 version.
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 5G features a little bit better hardware performance than Xiaomi Mi 10T Lite, and although they both have 8 processing cores, the Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 5G also has a greater amount of RAM memory. The Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 5G features a bit sharper display than Xiaomi Mi 10T Lite, and although they both have a display with the same size, the Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 5G also has a bit greater display density and a little higher 1080 x 2636 resolution.
The Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 5G has much more storage capacity for applications, games, photos and videos than Xiaomi Mi 10T Lite, because it has more internal memory. The Xiaomi Mi 10T Lite captures clearer pictures and videos than Galaxy Z Flip 5G, because although it has a smaller aperture which is not favorable for low light photography, and they both have the same video frame rates and the same (4K) video resolution, the Xiaomi Mi 10T Lite also counts with a lot bigger sensor capturing much higher quality photos and a camera with a much higher resolution.
Xiaomi Mi 10T Lite counts with a way better battery life than Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 5G, because it has a 46% greater battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.