Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 92.3 | 82.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Xiaomi |
| Android 11, 10 | Android 10, 9.0 Pie |
| 2020-08-07 | 2019-06-17 |
| 6.59 x 2.90 x 0.28 inches | 6.17 x 2.93 x 0.35 inches |
| 6.46 ounces | 6.74 ounces |
| Mystic bronze, Mystic gray and Mystic white | Carbon Black, Flame Red and Glacier Blue |
| Aluminum | Metal and Metal |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 603.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 2636 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| Dynamic AMOLED | AMOLED |
| 425 pixels per inch | 403 pixels per inch |
| -- | 430 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.3 | 8.4 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ SM8250-AB chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 730 SM7150-AA chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 3100 MHz) processor | Kryo 470, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | Adreno 618 GPU |
| 9.81 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.3 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 20.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (960 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.23 | 11.66 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.28 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 5G is much better than the Xiaomi Mi 9T, getting a 92.3 score against 82.2. These phones have Android OS (operating system), but the Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 5G has newer 11 version and Xiaomi Mi 9T has Android 10, so it offers some additional features and optimized performance. The Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 5G construction is newer, just a little bit lighter and thinner than Xiaomi Mi 9T.
Xiaomi Mi 9T features a bit more vivid display than Galaxy Z Flip 5G, although it has a just a bit less pixels per screen inch, a little bit smaller screen and a bit worse 1080 x 2340 pixels resolution. Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 5G counts with a much greater storage to install applications and games than Xiaomi Mi 9T, because it has 256 GB internal memory.
Galaxy Z Flip 5G features a little better hardware performance than Xiaomi Mi 9T, and although they both have a Octa-Core CPU, the Galaxy Z Flip 5G also has a greater amount of RAM. Xiaomi Mi 9T captures much better photos and videos than Galaxy Z Flip 5G, because although it has worse video frame rate, and they both have a same size aperture and the same (4K) video quality, the Xiaomi Mi 9T also counts with a way larger back camera sensor capturing way better quality videos and photos and a back facing camera with a lot better 48 mega pixels resolution.
Xiaomi Mi 9T has superior battery duration than Galaxy Z Flip 5G, because it has a 4000mAh battery capacity against 3300mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.