Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 92.3 | 83.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Xiaomi |
| Android 11, 10 | -- |
| 2020-08-07 | 2018-11-01 |
| 6.59 x 2.90 x 0.28 inches | 6.22 x 2.94 x 0.33 inches |
| 6.46 ounces | 7.69 ounces |
| Mystic bronze, Mystic gray and Mystic white | Black, Blue and Green |
| Aluminum | Aluminum and Ceramic |
| $ 603.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 2636 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| Dynamic AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 425 pixels per inch | 403 pixels per inch |
| -- | 600 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.3 | 8.6 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ SM8250-AB chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 3100 MHz) processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 9.81 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.3 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP | 12.20 MP + 24.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (960 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.23 | 10.34 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.3 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3200mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 5.28 | 5.2 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 5G is much better than Xiaomi Mi Mix 3, getting a 92.3 score against 83.8. Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 5G's design is newer, somewhat thinner and somewhat lighter than the Xiaomi Mi Mix 3. The Xiaomi Mi Mix 3 counts with a bit more vivid screen than Galaxy Z Flip 5G, although it has a just a bit lower pixel density, a bit smaller display and a quite lower resolution of 1080 x 2340px.
The Xiaomi Mi Mix 3's storage to store more apps and games is just as good as the Galaxy Z Flip 5G one, they have exactly the same 256 GB internal storage. The Galaxy Z Flip 5G counts with a bit more powerful processing unit than Xiaomi Mi Mix 3. Both of them have a Octa-Core processing unit and the same RAM amount.
The Xiaomi Mi Mix 3 captures clearer pictures and videos than Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 5G, and although they both have the same 60 fps video frame rates, a same size aperture, the same 3840x2160 (4K) video definition and the same camera sensor size, the Xiaomi Mi Mix 3 also has a back camera with a better 12.2 mega pixels resolution.
Galaxy Z Flip 5G counts with just a bit better battery lifetime than Xiaomi Mi Mix 3, because it has a 3% bigger battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.