Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 92.3 | 88.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Xiaomi |
| Android 11, 10 | Android 10 |
| 2020-08-07 | 2019-09-24 |
| 6.59 x 2.90 x 0.28 inches | 6.08 x 2.85 x 0.41 inches |
| 6.46 ounces | 8.50 ounces |
| Mystic bronze, Mystic gray and Mystic white | Black |
| Aluminum | Titanium |
| $ 603.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 7.9 inches |
| 2636 x 1080 pixels | 2250 x 2088 pixels |
| Dynamic AMOLED | OLED |
| 425 pixels per inch | 389 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.3 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ SM8250-AB chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ SM8150-AC chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 3100 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2960 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9.81 | 9.81 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 512 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.3 | 17.6 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP | 108.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.75 inches (1/1.33") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.23 | 10.56 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4050mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.28 | 6 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 5G has a global score of 92.3, which is a little bit better than the Xiaomi Mi Mix Alpha's global score of 88.9. The Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 5G construction is newer, way lighter and noticeably thinner than Xiaomi Mi Mix Alpha. These phones come with Android OS (operating system), but Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 5G has 11 version while Xiaomi Mi Mix Alpha has Android 10.
The Xiaomi Mi Mix Alpha has a processor that is just as good as the processing unit in Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 5G, and although the Xiaomi Mi Mix Alpha has a higher amount of RAM memory, they both have a Octa-Core processing unit. The Galaxy Z Flip 5G features a little sharper display than Xiaomi Mi Mix Alpha, because although it has a lot lower 1080 x 2636 resolution and a quite smaller display, it also counts with a little higher display pixel density.
Xiaomi Mi Mix Alpha shoots a bit better photographs and videos than Galaxy Z Flip 5G, and although they both have the same (4K) video resolution and the same video frame rates, the Xiaomi Mi Mix Alpha also has a much larger sensor, a lot more mega pixels camera and a larger diafragm aperture for better low light photography and videos.
Xiaomi Mi Mix Alpha counts with much more storage capacity for games and applications than Galaxy Z Flip 5G, because it has 512 GB internal storage capacity. Xiaomi Mi Mix Alpha has superior battery duration than Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 5G, because it has a 4050mAh battery size against 3300mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.