Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 92.3 | 79.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Xiaomi |
| Android 11, 10 | Android 10 |
| 2020-08-07 | 2021-04-16 |
| 6.59 x 2.90 x 0.28 inches | 6.82 x 5.25 x 0.30 inches |
| 6.46 ounces | 11.18 ounces |
| Mystic bronze, Mystic gray and Mystic white | Black and Ceramic |
| Aluminum | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| $ 603.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 8 inches |
| 2636 x 1080 pixels | 2480 x 1860 pixels |
| Dynamic AMOLED | AMOLED |
| 425 pixels per inch | 388 pixels per inch |
| -- | 900 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.3 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ SM8250-AB chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 SM8350 (5 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 3100 MHz) processor | processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | Adreno 660 GPU |
| 9.81 | 6.21 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.3 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP | 108.00 MP + 20.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | 80.00mm focal length |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | -- |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.23 | 10.45 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 5020mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.28 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 5G has a general score of 92.3, which is better than Xiaomi Mi Mix Fold's score of 79.8. Although the Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 5G and the Xiaomi Mi Mix Fold were released only 8 months apart, the Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 5G is just a bit thinner and way lighter. These phones include Android OS, but Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 5G has newer 11 version while Xiaomi Mi Mix Fold has Android 10 version.
Galaxy Z Flip 5G has a very superior hardware performance than Xiaomi Mi Mix Fold, although it has lesser RAM memory, they both have the same number of cores. The Xiaomi Mi Mix Fold has a little sharper display than Galaxy Z Flip 5G, because although it has a bit lower pixel density, it also counts with a better 1860 x 2480 resolution and a larger display.
The Xiaomi Mi Mix Fold takes just a bit better photos and videos than Galaxy Z Flip 5G, and although they both have a same size aperture, the Xiaomi Mi Mix Fold also has a lot more mega pixels back facing camera. The Xiaomi Mi Mix Fold counts with as much storage capacity for applications and games as the Galaxy Z Flip 5G one, both have exactly the same internal storage capacity.
Xiaomi Mi Mix Fold features a really longer battery life than Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 5G, because it has 5020mAh of battery capacity instead of 3300mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.