Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 92.3 | 76 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Xiaomi |
| Android 11, 10 | Android 6.0 Marshmallow |
| 2020-08-07 | 2016-11-01 |
| 6.59 x 2.90 x 0.28 inches | 6.15 x 3.04 x 0.30 inches |
| 6.46 ounces | 5.86 ounces |
| Mystic bronze, Mystic gray and Mystic white | Black and Silver |
| Aluminum | Aluminum and Glass |
| $ 603.00 | $ 516.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 5.7 inches |
| 2636 x 1080 pixels | 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) |
| Dynamic AMOLED | OLED |
| 425 pixels per inch | 386 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.3 | 7.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ SM8250-AB chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 821 MSM8996 Pro chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 3100 MHz) processor | Kryo, 64-bit (Quad-Core 2350 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | Adreno 530 GPU |
| 9.81 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.3 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP | 23.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.23 | 8.69 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | -- |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.1 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4070mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.28 | 6 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Galaxy Z Flip 5G is much better than Xiaomi Mi Note 2, with a general score of 92.3 against 76. Galaxy Z Flip 5G is a newer and a little thinner phone than the Xiaomi Mi Note 2, but it is a little bit heavier. Both phones in this review work with Android OS (Operating System), but Galaxy Z Flip 5G has the older 11 version while Xiaomi Mi Note 2 has Android 6.0 Marshmallow.
The Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 5G has a bit more powerful processing unit than Xiaomi Mi Note 2, because it has 2 GB more RAM memory and 4 more CPU cores. Galaxy Z Flip 5G has just a bit better looking screen than Xiaomi Mi Note 2, because it has a bigger screen, a little bit higher 1080 x 2636 resolution and a just a bit more pixels per inch of screen.
The Galaxy Z Flip 5G shoots much better videos and photos than Xiaomi Mi Note 2, because although it has a lower 3840x2160 (4K) video resolution and a way worse 12 megapixels resolution back camera, it also counts with a bigger back-facing camera sensor providing a higher image quality and a bigger diafragm aperture to take better low-light images and videos.
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 5G counts with much more storage capacity to install games and applications than Xiaomi Mi Note 2, because it has 128 GB more internal memory. The Xiaomi Mi Note 2 counts with better battery life than Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 5G, because it has a 23% greater battery capacity.
The Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 5G costs more money than Xiaomi Mi Note 2, but you can get a much better phone for that extra dollars.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.