Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 92.3 | 87.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Xiaomi |
| Android 11, 10 | Android 10 |
| 2020-08-07 | 2020-05-12 |
| 6.59 x 2.90 x 0.28 inches | 6.43 x 2.97 x 0.35 inches |
| 6.46 ounces | 7.73 ounces |
| Mystic bronze, Mystic gray and Mystic white | Cyber grey, Electric purple, Neon blue and Phantom white |
| Aluminum | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 603.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2636 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Dynamic AMOLED | AMOLED |
| 425 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| -- | 800 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.3 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ SM8250-AB chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 3100 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 9.81 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.3 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 20.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (960 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.23 | 12.98 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4700mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.28 | 6.56 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 5G is slightly better than the Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro, having a score of 92.3 against 87.9. Both devices in this comparison come with Android OS (operating system), but the Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 5G has newer 11 version while Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro has Android 10 version, so it provides you a couple nice extra features. Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 5G's construction is lighter and somewhat thinner than the Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro, although both of them were released with only a few months difference.
The Galaxy Z Flip 5G counts with a little faster CPU than Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro, and although they both have 8 processing cores, the Galaxy Z Flip 5G also has a larger amount of RAM memory. The Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro features a bit better display than Galaxy Z Flip 5G, although it has a little lower resolution of 1080 x 2400 pixels and a little bit less pixels per inch in the display, they both have a same size screen.
The Galaxy Z Flip 5G features a superior memory for apps and games than Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro, because it has 256 GB internal storage. Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro takes much better photos and videos than Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 5G, because although it has a tinier aperture, it also counts with a way bigger back-facing camera sensor capturing more light and vivid colors, a much higher 64 mega pixels resolution camera in the back and a much better video resolution.
Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro features a way better battery lifetime than Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 5G, because it has 4700mAh of battery capacity against 3300mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.