Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 92.3 | 78.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Xiaomi |
| Android 11, 10 | Android 13 |
| 2020-08-07 | 2023-05-09 |
| 6.59 x 2.90 x 0.28 inches | 6.34 x 2.95 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.46 ounces | 6.38 ounces |
| Mystic bronze, Mystic gray and Mystic white | Black, Blue and White |
| Aluminum | -- |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 603.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2636 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Dynamic AMOLED | AMOLED |
| 425 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| -- | 1000 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.3 | 8.8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ SM8250-AB chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 7+ Gen 2 SM7475-AB (4 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 3100 MHz) processor | processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | Adreno 725 GPU |
| 9.81 | 6.21 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.3 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | -- |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.23 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.28 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.3 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Galaxy Z Flip 5G has a score of 92.3, which is better than Xiaomi Poco F5's score of 78.2. The Galaxy Z Flip 5G is a way older and a bit heavier phone than the Xiaomi Poco F5, but Samsung could make it just a little thinner anyway. Both phones in this comparison review include Android OS (operating system), but Galaxy Z Flip 5G has the previous 11 version while Xiaomi Poco F5 has Android 13.
The Xiaomi Poco F5 counts with a little sharper display than Galaxy Z Flip 5G, although it has a bit worse resolution of 1080 x 2400 pixels and a little inferior quantity of pixels per inch of display, they both have a screen with the same size. Galaxy Z Flip 5G and Xiaomi Poco F5 both count with very similar memory capacity to install applications and games or saving photos and videos, both of them have the same internal memory.
Galaxy Z Flip 5G features a much powerful CPU than Xiaomi Poco F5. They have a 8 GB RAM and the same number of cores. The Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 5G takes just a bit better pictures and videos than Xiaomi Poco F5, although it has a camera in the back with a lot lower resolution, they both have the same diafragm aperture.
Xiaomi Poco F5 features a way better battery life than Galaxy Z Flip 5G, because it has a 5000mAh battery capacity against 3300mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.