Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 92.3 | 79.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Xiaomi |
| Android 11, 10 | Android 13 |
| 2020-08-07 | 2023-05-09 |
| 6.59 x 2.90 x 0.28 inches | 6.41 x 2.97 x 0.34 inches |
| 6.46 ounces | 7.20 ounces |
| Mystic bronze, Mystic gray and Mystic white | Black and White |
| Aluminum | -- |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 603.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2636 x 1080 pixels | 3200 x 1440 pixels |
| Dynamic AMOLED | AMOLED |
| 425 pixels per inch | 524 pixels per inch |
| -- | 1400 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.3 | 9.7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ SM8250-AB chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 2 SM8475 (4 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 3100 MHz) processor | processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | Adreno 730 GPU |
| 9.81 | 6.21 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.3 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | -- |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.23 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 5160mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 5.28 | 6.88 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.3 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Galaxy Z Flip 5G is better than the Xiaomi POCO F5 Pro, getting a 92.3 score against 79.5. Both devices in this review include Android OS (operating system), but the Galaxy Z Flip 5G has older 11 version while Xiaomi POCO F5 Pro has Android 13. The Galaxy Z Flip 5G is an extremely older cellphone than Xiaomi POCO F5 Pro, but it is thinner and lighter anyway.
The Xiaomi POCO F5 Pro has a sharper display than Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 5G, and although they both have a display with the same size, the Xiaomi POCO F5 Pro also has a higher 1440 x 3200 resolution and a just a bit greater screen density. Galaxy Z Flip 5G has a really superior performance than Xiaomi POCO F5 Pro. They have the same RAM amount and 8 CPU cores.
The Xiaomi POCO F5 Pro counts with as much memory for applications and games as the Galaxy Z Flip 5G one, both have equal internal storage. The Xiaomi POCO F5 Pro features a superior battery duration than Galaxy Z Flip 5G, because it has a 56 percent larger battery size. Galaxy Z Flip 5G counts with a bit better camera than Xiaomi POCO F5 Pro, although it has a lot less mega-pixels back-facing camera, they both have the same aperture.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.