Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 92.3 | 78.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Xiaomi |
| Android 11, 10 | Android 10 |
| 2020-08-07 | 2020-07-14 |
| 6.59 x 2.90 x 0.28 inches | 6.53 x 3.02 x 0.35 inches |
| 6.46 ounces | 7.37 ounces |
| Mystic bronze, Mystic gray and Mystic white | Green and Greener, Out of the Blue and Two Shades of Black |
| Aluminum | -- |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 603.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2636 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Dynamic AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 425 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.3 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ SM8250-AB chipset | Snapdragon 720G SM7125 chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 3100 MHz) processor | Kryo 465, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | Adreno 618 GPU |
| 9.81 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.23 | 11.11 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.28 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 5G is much better than the Xiaomi Poco M2 Pro, with a score of 92.3 against 78.7. Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 5G is a lighter and somewhat thinner cellphone than the Xiaomi Poco M2 Pro, even when they were released with only a couple of months difference. These phones come with Android OS (Operating System), but Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 5G has newer 11 version and Xiaomi Poco M2 Pro has Android 10.
The Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 5G has a little better processing power than Xiaomi Poco M2 Pro, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 5G also has a larger amount of RAM. Galaxy Z Flip 5G counts with a bit better screen than Xiaomi Poco M2 Pro, and although they both have a display of the same size, the Galaxy Z Flip 5G also has a bit greater pixel density and a bit higher resolution of 1080 x 2636px.
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 5G counts with a bigger memory capacity for applications, games, photos and videos than Xiaomi Poco M2 Pro, because although it has no slot for an external memory card, it also counts with 256 GB internal storage. Xiaomi Poco M2 Pro shoots a bit better photos and videos than Galaxy Z Flip 5G, because although it has worse video frame rates, and they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video resolution and a same size diafragm aperture, the Xiaomi Poco M2 Pro also counts with a lot more megapixels back facing camera.
Xiaomi Poco M2 Pro counts with a way better battery lifetime than Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 5G, because it has a 52 percent larger battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.