Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 92.3 | 79.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Xiaomi |
| Android 11, 10 | Android 11, 10 |
| 2020-08-07 | 2020-02-11 |
| 6.59 x 2.90 x 0.28 inches | 6.51 x 3.02 x 0.35 inches |
| 6.46 ounces | 7.34 ounces |
| Mystic bronze, Mystic gray and Mystic white | Atlantis blue, Matrix purple and Phoenix red |
| Aluminum | Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) and Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 603.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2636 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Dynamic AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 425 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.3 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ SM8250-AB chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G SM7150-AB chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 3100 MHz) processor | Kryo 470, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | Adreno 618 GPU |
| 9.81 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.3 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 20.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.23 | 12.1 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.28 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy Z Flip 5G has a global score of 92.3, which is much better than Xiaomi Poco X2's overall score of 79.3. Galaxy Z Flip 5G is a lighter and thinner device than Xiaomi Poco X2, although both were released with only a couple of months difference. Both of these phones use the same Android 11 OS (Operating System), so both should give you the same OS features.
Galaxy Z Flip 5G counts with a slightly better looking display than Xiaomi Poco X2, and although they both have a same size display, the Galaxy Z Flip 5G also has a slightly higher 1080 x 2636 resolution and a just a bit greater display density. The Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 5G features a bit more powerful processor than Xiaomi Poco X2, and although they both have 8 processing cores, the Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 5G also has a larger amount of RAM memory.
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 5G counts with a very superior storage capacity for games and applications than Xiaomi Poco X2, because it has 256 GB internal memory capacity. Xiaomi Poco X2 counts with superior battery duration than Galaxy Z Flip 5G, because it has 4500mAh of battery capacity against 3300mAh.
Xiaomi Poco X2 takes much clearer photos and videos than Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 5G, because although it has a tinier camera aperture and slower video frame rates, and they both have the same video resolution, the Xiaomi Poco X2 also counts with a much bigger back camera sensor shooting way better quality photos and a back-facing camera with lot more mega pixels.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.