Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 92.3 | 81.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Xiaomi |
| Android 11, 10 | Android 10 |
| 2020-08-07 | 2020-09-08 |
| 6.59 x 2.90 x 0.28 inches | 6.51 x 3.02 x 0.37 inches |
| 6.46 ounces | 7.58 ounces |
| Mystic bronze, Mystic gray and Mystic white | Cobalt blue and Shadow gray |
| Aluminum | Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 603.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2636 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Dynamic AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 425 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| -- | 450 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.3 | 8.4 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ SM8250-AB chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 732G SM7150-AC chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 3100 MHz) processor | Kryo 470, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | Adreno 618 GPU |
| 9.81 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 10.78 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 20.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.23 | 12.1 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 5160mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.28 | 6.88 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 5G is much better than the Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC, with a 92.3 score against 81.6. The Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 5G is a somewhat lighter and notably thinner device than Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC, even when both were released with only 1 months difference. Both phones we are comparing here have Android operating system, but the Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 5G has newer 11 version and Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC has Android 10 version, offering a couple additional features and a performance increase.
The Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC has a little sharper display than Galaxy Z Flip 5G, although it has a bit worse 1080 x 2400 resolution and a just a little less pixels per screen inch, they both have a screen of the same size. The Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 5G has a superior storage capacity to install games and applications than Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC, because although it has no slot for an external memory card, it also counts with more internal storage capacity.
The Galaxy Z Flip 5G features just a little better processing power than Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC, and although they both have a Octa-Core processing unit, the Galaxy Z Flip 5G also has more RAM. Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC counts with a better camera than Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 5G, because although it has slower video frame rate and a smaller aperture which is not good for low-light photos and videos, and they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video quality, the Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC also counts with a much larger camera sensor providing a much higher image quality and a much more MP camera in the back.
The Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC counts with a very superior battery duration than Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 5G, because it has 5160mAh of battery capacity against 3300mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.