Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 92.3 | 78.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Xiaomi |
| Android 11, 10 | Android 10 |
| 2020-08-07 | 2021-01-18 |
| 6.59 x 2.90 x 0.28 inches | 6.39 x 3.04 x 0.38 inches |
| 6.46 ounces | 6.98 ounces |
| Mystic bronze, Mystic gray and Mystic white | Carbon gray, Ocean green, Sunrise orange and Twilight blue |
| Aluminum | Plastic and Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 603.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2636 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| Dynamic AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 425 pixels per inch | 396 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.3 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ SM8250-AB chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 662 SM6115 chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 3100 MHz) processor | Kryo 260, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | Adreno 610 GPU |
| 9.81 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.23 | 10.78 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 6000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.28 | 7.52 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy Z Flip 5G has a score of 92.3, which is better than the Xiaomi Redmi 9T's 78.2 global score. Both phones in this review work with Android OS (Operating System), but Galaxy Z Flip 5G has 11 version while Xiaomi Redmi 9T has Android 10 version. Even when the Galaxy Z Flip 5G and the Xiaomi Redmi 9T were only released with a couple months difference, the Galaxy Z Flip 5G is much thinner and just a little lighter.
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 5G features just a bit better screen than Xiaomi Redmi 9T, because it has a bit bigger screen, a little higher 1080 x 2636 resolution and a little higher display pixels density. The Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 5G has a quite bigger storage capacity to install games and applications than Xiaomi Redmi 9T, because although it has no slot for an SD memory card, it also counts with 256 GB internal memory.
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 5G has a little bit better performance than Xiaomi Redmi 9T, and although they both have 8 cores, the Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 5G also has 4 GB more RAM memory. The Xiaomi Redmi 9T captures just a bit better photos and videos than Galaxy Z Flip 5G, because although it has slower 30 frames per second video frame rate, and they both have a same size camera aperture and the same 1920x1080 video quality, the Xiaomi Redmi 9T also counts with a back-facing camera with a much higher 48 MP resolution and a lot bigger back camera sensor which provides a way better image and video quality.
Xiaomi Redmi 9T features a very superior battery lifetime than Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 5G, because it has an 82 percent more battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.