Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 92.3 | 91.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Xiaomi |
| Android 11, 10 | Android 12 |
| 2020-08-07 | 2022-11-01 |
| 6.59 x 2.90 x 0.28 inches | 6.41 x 2.99 x 0.35 inches |
| 6.46 ounces | 7.32 ounces |
| Mystic bronze, Mystic gray and Mystic white | Black |
| Aluminum | Aluminum and Glass |
| $ 603.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2636 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Dynamic AMOLED | OLED |
| 425 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| -- | 900 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.3 | 8.8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ SM8250-AB chipset | MediaTek Dimensity 1080 MT6877V (6 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 3100 MHz) processor | Octa-Core 2600 MHz processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | Mali-G68 MC4 GPU |
| 9.81 | 9.54 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.3 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP | 200.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | 24.00mm focal length |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.71 inches (1/1.4") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.23 | 13.97 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4300mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.28 | 6.16 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Galaxy Z Flip 5G is just a bit better than the Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 Explorer, with a 92.3 score against 91.5. Galaxy Z Flip 5G's construction is somewhat lighter and somewhat thinner than Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 Explorer, although it was released 2 years before. Both phones in our current comparison work with Android OS (Operating System), but Galaxy Z Flip 5G has the older 11 version and Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 Explorer has Android 12.
The Galaxy Z Flip 5G has a bit better processor than Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 Explorer. Both of them have 8 processing cores and 8 GB of RAM. Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 Explorer features a bit sharper screen than Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 5G, although it has a bit inferior quantity of pixels per inch of display and a quite lower 1080 x 2400 resolution, they both have a display with the same size.
Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 Explorer features a greater camera than Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 5G, because although it has worse 30 fps video frame rates, and they both have the same (4K) video resolution, the Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 Explorer also counts with a larger aperture to capture better low-light photography and videos, a back facing camera with a lot higher resolution and a much bigger back-facing camera sensor.
The Galaxy Z Flip 5G and the Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 Explorer count with incredibly similar storage capacity to install applications and games, both of them have equal internal storage capacity. The Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 Explorer has greater battery duration than Galaxy Z Flip 5G, because it has a 30% more battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.