Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 92.3 | 83.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Xiaomi |
| Android 11, 10 | Android 13 |
| 2020-08-07 | 2024-01-15 |
| 6.59 x 2.90 x 0.28 inches | 6.34 x 2.92 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.46 ounces | -- |
| Mystic bronze, Mystic gray and Mystic white | Aurora Purple, Midnight Black and Ocean Teal |
| Aluminum | -- |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 603.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2636 x 1080 pixels | 2710 x 1220 pixels |
| Dynamic AMOLED | AMOLED |
| 425 pixels per inch | 444 pixels per inch |
| -- | 1800 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.3 | 9.5 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ SM8250-AB chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 7s Gen 2 SM7435-AB (4 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 3100 MHz) processor | processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | Adreno 710 GPU |
| 9.81 | 6.21 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 18.62 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP | 200.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.60 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.71 inches (1/1.4") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | -- |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.23 | 12.21 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | -- |
| 10.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 5100mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.28 | 6.88 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Galaxy Z Flip 5G has an overall score of 92.3, which is much better than Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro 5G's overall score of 83.1. These phones come with Android OS, but Galaxy Z Flip 5G has an older 11 version and Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro 5G has Android 13. Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 5G counts with a much faster processing unit than Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro 5G. They have a 8 GB RAM and a Octa-Core processing unit.
Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro 5G features a sharper screen than Galaxy Z Flip 5G, and although they both have a same size screen, the Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro 5G also has a little bit better display density and a little higher 1220 x 2710px resolution. The Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro 5G counts with a superior memory to store more games and applications than Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 5G, and although they both have exactly the same internal storage, the Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro 5G also has a SD memory slot that allows a maximum of 1 TB.
The Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro 5G counts with a much longer battery performance than Galaxy Z Flip 5G, because it has a 5100mAh battery size instead of 3300mAh. The Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro 5G features a much better camera than Galaxy Z Flip 5G, because it has a back facing camera with much more mega-pixels, a lot bigger camera sensor shooting lot better quality videos and photos and a bigger diafragm aperture.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.