Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 92.3 | 77.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Xiaomi |
| Android 11, 10 | Android 8.1 Oreo |
| 2020-08-07 | 2018-11-23 |
| 6.59 x 2.90 x 0.28 inches | 6.22 x 3.01 x 0.33 inches |
| 6.46 ounces | 6.42 ounces |
| Mystic bronze, Mystic gray and Mystic white | 16 777 216 |
| Aluminum | Metal and Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 603.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.3 inches |
| 2636 x 1080 pixels | 2280 x 1080 pixels |
| Dynamic AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 425 pixels per inch | 400 pixels per inch |
| -- | 500 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.3 | 8.5 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ SM8250-AB chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 636 SDM636 chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 3100 MHz) processor | Kryo 260, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1800 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | Adreno 509 GPU |
| 9.81 | 9 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 10.78 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 20.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.23 | 9.24 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.3 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.28 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 5G is much better than the Xiaomi Redmi Note 6 Pro, getting a 92.3 score against 77.2. Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 5G's body is newer and thinner than Xiaomi Redmi Note 6 Pro's, although it's also a little heavier. Both phones we are comparing here work with Android OS (Operating System), but the Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 5G has older 11 version and Xiaomi Redmi Note 6 Pro has Android 8.1 Oreo.
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 5G counts with a bit better processing power than Xiaomi Redmi Note 6 Pro, and although they both have 8 cpu cores, the Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 5G also has a greater amount of RAM. Xiaomi Redmi Note 6 Pro counts with a little more vivid display than Galaxy Z Flip 5G, although it has a little bit smaller display, a quite worse pixel quantity per inch in the screen and a bit lower 1080 x 2280 pixels resolution.
Galaxy Z Flip 5G features a much better camera than Xiaomi Redmi Note 6 Pro, and although they both have a back facing camera with a 12 MP resolution and a 0.39 inches back-facing camera sensor, the Galaxy Z Flip 5G also has a way higher (4K) video resolution and a bigger diafragm aperture to capture better low light photos.
The Galaxy Z Flip 5G features a much greater storage to install applications and games than Xiaomi Redmi Note 6 Pro, because although it has no external memory slot, it also counts with more internal storage. The Xiaomi Redmi Note 6 Pro has improved battery performance than Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 5G, because it has 4000mAh of battery capacity against 3300mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.