Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 92.3 | 76.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Xiaomi |
| Android 11, 10 | Android 10 |
| 2020-08-07 | 2020-05-20 |
| 6.59 x 2.90 x 0.28 inches | 6.39 x 3.04 x 0.35 inches |
| 6.46 ounces | 7.02 ounces |
| Mystic bronze, Mystic gray and Mystic white | Forest green, Midnight gray and Polar white |
| Aluminum | Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 603.00 | $ 283.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2636 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| Dynamic AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 425 pixels per inch | 396 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.3 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ SM8250-AB chipset | MediaTek Helio G85 chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 3100 MHz) processor | Arm Cortex-A75 and ArmCortex-A55, 64-bit, 12 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 3 GB RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | Mali G52 MC2 GPU |
| 9.81 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 10.02 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 13.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.23 | 11 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 5020mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.28 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Galaxy Z Flip 5G has a general score of 92.3, which is much better than the Xiaomi Redmi Note 9's 76.6 score. Even when the Galaxy Z Flip 5G and Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 were only released 3 months apart, the Galaxy Z Flip 5G is thinner and just a little bit lighter. These phones include Android OS (Operating System), but Galaxy Z Flip 5G has a newer 11 version while Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 has Android 10, giving you lots of additional features.
Galaxy Z Flip 5G has a bit sharper screen than Xiaomi Redmi Note 9, because it has a little bit larger screen, a little higher resolution of 1080 x 2636 and a quite greater quantity of pixels in each inch in the display. Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 5G has a bit faster CPU than Xiaomi Redmi Note 9, and although they both have a Octa-Core CPU, the Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 5G also has 5 GB more RAM memory.
The Galaxy Z Flip 5G has a much better storage for games and applications than Xiaomi Redmi Note 9, because although it has no SD memory slot, it also counts with 256 GB internal storage capacity. Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 has a little bit better camera than Galaxy Z Flip 5G, because although it has slower video frame rate, and they both have a F1.8 aperture and the same video definition, the Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 also counts with a much bigger back-facing camera sensor which offers a way better image and video quality and a back-facing camera with way more mega pixels.
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 counts with a much longer battery lifetime than Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 5G, because it has a 5020mAh battery size.
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 5G costs a lot more money than the Xiaomi Redmi Note 9, but it's still a good choice, because you can get a lot more features for that extra money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.