Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 92.3 | 83 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Xiaomi |
| Android 11, 10 | Android 10 |
| 2020-08-07 | 2021-01-18 |
| 6.59 x 2.90 x 0.28 inches | 6.37 x 3.04 x 0.36 inches |
| 6.46 ounces | 7.02 ounces |
| Mystic bronze, Mystic gray and Mystic white | Daybreak purple and Nightfall black |
| Aluminum | Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 603.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2636 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| Dynamic AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 425 pixels per inch | 396 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.3 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ SM8250-AB chipset | MediaTek Dimensity 800U chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 3100 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A76 and ARM Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | Mali-G57 MC3 GPU |
| 9.81 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 13.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (120 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.23 | 11.55 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.28 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 5G is better than the Xiaomi Redmi Note 9T, getting a 92.3 score against 83. The Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 5G is a a little lighter and extremely thinner device than Xiaomi Redmi Note 9T, although both of them were released with only 5 months difference. Both phones in this review come with Android OS (Operating System), but Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 5G has the newer 11 version and Xiaomi Redmi Note 9T has Android 10 version.
The Galaxy Z Flip 5G has a bit better looking screen than Xiaomi Redmi Note 9T, because it has a just a little more pixels per inch of display, a quite better 1080 x 2636 resolution and a little larger screen. The Galaxy Z Flip 5G features just a little better processing power than Xiaomi Redmi Note 9T, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Galaxy Z Flip 5G also has 4 GB more RAM.
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9T shoots much clearer videos and photos than Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 5G, because although it has worse 30 fps video frame rate, and they both have the same diafragm aperture and the same (4K) video definition, the Xiaomi Redmi Note 9T also counts with a way bigger back-facing camera sensor capturing much higher quality videos and photos and a much higher 48 megapixels resolution back camera.
The Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 5G features a quite bigger memory for games and applications than Xiaomi Redmi Note 9T, because although it has no SD memory slot, it also counts with 256 GB internal memory capacity. The Xiaomi Redmi Note 9T has a very superior battery life than Galaxy Z Flip 5G, because it has a 5000mAh battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.