Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 92.3 | 78.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | ZTE |
| Android 11, 10 | Android 11 |
| 2020-08-07 | 2021-06-04 |
| 6.59 x 2.90 x 0.28 inches | 6.36 x 2.87 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.46 ounces | 6.63 ounces |
| Mystic bronze, Mystic gray and Mystic white | Black, Gold, Green and White |
| Aluminum | Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 603.00 | $ 749.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2636 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Dynamic AMOLED | AMOLED |
| 425 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.3 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ SM8250-AB chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 SM8350 chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 3100 MHz) processor | Kryo 680, 64-bit, 5 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | Adreno 660 GPU |
| 9.81 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.3 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.60 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | 35.00mm focal length |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.23 | 11.99 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 10.1 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4600mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.28 | 6.48 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Galaxy Z Flip 5G has an overall score of 92.3, which is much better than the ZTE Axon 30 Ultra's 78.1 score. Although Galaxy Z Flip 5G is older than ZTE Axon 30 Ultra, it's design is just a little bit thinner and just a little bit lighter. Both devices in our current comparison come with the same Android 11 OS (Operating System).
Galaxy Z Flip 5G has a little more vivid display than ZTE Axon 30 Ultra, and although they both have a screen of the same size, the Galaxy Z Flip 5G also has a bit higher resolution of 1080 x 2636 pixels and a just a little better pixel number in each inch in the screen. The Galaxy Z Flip 5G counts with a bit better CPU than ZTE Axon 30 Ultra. Both of them have the same number of cores and a 8 GB RAM memory.
ZTE Axon 30 Ultra has a superior camera than Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 5G, because it has a bigger aperture to take better low light images, a camera in the back with way more megapixels and a much higher video quality. Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 5G has a much greater memory capacity to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than ZTE Axon 30 Ultra, because it has 128 GB more internal memory capacity.
ZTE Axon 30 Ultra counts with a much better battery lifetime than Galaxy Z Flip 5G, because it has a 4600mAh battery size instead of 3300mAh.
In addition to being the best phone in our comparison, Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 5G is also a bargain compared to the other devices.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.