Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.6 | 95.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 14 | Android 13, 12 |
| -- | 2022-02-25 |
| -- | 6.43 x 3.07 x 0.35 inches |
| -- | 8.08 ounces |
| -- | Burgundy, Green, Phantom Black and White |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass Victus 2) | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass Victus) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 1200.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.8 inches |
| 2640 x 1080 pixels | 3088 x 1440 pixels |
| Dynamic AMOLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 426 pixels per inch | 501 pixels per inch |
| -- | 1750 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.6 | 9.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 SM8550-AC (4 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 SM8450 (4 nm) chipset |
| processor | Quad-Core 2800 MHz + Quad-Core 1800 MHz processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 750 GPU | Adreno 730 GPU |
| 6.21 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.3 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP | 108.00 MP + 40.00 MP |
| -- | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 23.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.75 inches (1/1.33") sensor |
| -- | 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 6.93 | 13.75 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 5.92 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.3 | Bluetooth 5.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra has a global score of 95.4, which is much better than Galaxy Z Flip 6's 75.6 overall score. Both devices in this comparison review come with Android OS, but the Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra has an older 13 version while Galaxy Z Flip 6 has Android 14 version. Galaxy S22 Ultra counts with a much sharper screen than Galaxy Z Flip 6, because it has a just a little higher quantity of pixels per inch in the display, a higher 1440 x 3088 resolution and a little larger screen.
The Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 6 has a much greater storage for games and applications than Galaxy S22 Ultra, because it has 256 GB internal memory capacity. Galaxy S22 Ultra has a lot better hardware performance than Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 6. Both have a Octa-Core processor and the same RAM amount. Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra counts with better battery duration than Galaxy Z Flip 6, because it has a 5000mAh battery capacity.
Galaxy S22 Ultra takes a lot better photos and videos than Galaxy Z Flip 6, because it has a lot higher resolution back camera.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.