Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.6 | 81.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Xiaomi |
| Android 14 | Android 10 |
| -- | 2020-05-05 |
| -- | 6.53 x 3.02 x 0.35 inches |
| -- | 7.37 ounces |
| -- | Glacier white, Interstellar gray and Tropical green |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass Victus 2) | Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) and Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 291.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2640 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Dynamic AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 426 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.6 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 SM8550-AC (4 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G SM7125 chipset |
| processor | Kryo 465, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 750 GPU | Adreno 618 GPU |
| 6.21 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| -- | f/1.90 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| -- | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 6.93 | 12.1 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Battery | 5020mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.92 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.3 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro is a little bit better than Galaxy Z Flip 6, getting an 81.1 score against 75.6. Both of these devices come with Android OS, but the Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro has the older 10 version and Galaxy Z Flip 6 has Android 14 version. The Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro counts with a bit sharper display than Galaxy Z Flip 6, although it has a little worse number of pixels per screen inch and a bit lower 1080 x 2400 resolution, they both have a display of the same size.
The Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro counts with a way better processing power than Galaxy Z Flip 6, although it has a smaller amount of RAM, they both have 8 CPU cores. Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 6 counts with a bigger memory capacity to store more apps and games than Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro, because although it has no slot for an external memory card, it also counts with more internal memory capacity.
The Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro features greater battery life than Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 6, because it has a 5020mAh battery size against 4000mAh. Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro features a very superior camera than Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 6, because it has a way more mega pixels back facing camera.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.