Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.1 | 88.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Apple |
| Android 15 | -- |
| -- | 2017-11-03 |
| -- | 5.65 x 2.79 x 0.30 inches |
| -- | 6.14 ounces |
| -- | Silver and Space gray |
| -- | Glass and Stainless steel |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 1149.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 5.8 inches |
| -- | 2436 x 1125 pixels |
| Dynamic AMOLED | OLED |
| -- | 463 pixels per inch |
| 2600 cd/m2 brightness | 625 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 4.8 | 8.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite for Galaxy SM8750-AB SM8750-AB (3 nm) chipset | Apple A11 Bionic APL1W72 (10 nm) chipset |
| processor | 64-bit Monsoon and Mistral, 64-bit (Hexa-Core 2390 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 3 GB RAM |
| Adreno 830 GPU | Apple 3-core GPU GPU |
| 6.21 | 10.17 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.3 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 10.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 7.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 23.00mm focal length | 28.00mm focal length |
| 0.64 inches (1/1.57") sensor | 0.33 inches (1/3") sensor |
| -- | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.12 | 10.12 |
| Networks | |
| -- | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G) and LTE (4G) | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 2716mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 5.92 | 4.72 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.3 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The iPhone X has a global score of 88.1, which is much better than the Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 7 (Rumored)'s 72.1 score. Apple iPhone X has a lot better display than Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 7 (Rumored), although it has a bit smaller screen and much worse brightness. The iPhone X's storage capacity to install applications and games or saving photos and videos is very similar to the Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 7 (Rumored) one, both have equal internal storage capacity.
Apple iPhone X has a much better performance than Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 7 (Rumored), because although it has less cpu cores and a smaller amount of RAM memory, it also counts with a 64-bit processor. The Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 7 (Rumored) has a superior battery performance than Apple iPhone X, because it has a 4000mAh battery size against 2716mAh.
IPhone X and Galaxy Z Flip 7 (Rumored) count with very similar cameras, and although the iPhone X has a camera with a way lower 12 mega-pixels resolution and a way tinier back camera sensor giving a lot lower image quality, they both have a F1.8 camera aperture.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.