Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.1 | 87.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | LG |
| Android 15 | -- |
| -- | 2020-05-15 |
| -- | 6.58 x 2.91 x 0.31 inches |
| -- | 6.35 ounces |
| -- | Aurora gray, Aurora green, Aurora silver, Aurora white and Illusion sunset |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 264.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.8 inches |
| -- | 2460 x 1080 pixels |
| Dynamic AMOLED | P-OLED |
| -- | 395 pixels per inch |
| 2600 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 4.8 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite for Galaxy SM8750-AB SM8750-AB (3 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset |
| processor | Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 830 GPU | Adreno 620 GPU |
| 6.21 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 17.06 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 10.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 23.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.64 inches (1/1.57") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| -- | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.12 | 11.44 |
| Networks | |
| -- | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G) and LTE (4G) | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.6 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4300mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 5.92 | 6.16 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.3 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
LG Velvet has an overall score of 87.1, which is a lot better than Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 7 (Rumored)'s score of 72.1. The LG Velvet counts with a very superior hardware performance than Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 7 (Rumored), although it has a lower amount of RAM memory, they both have a Octa-Core CPU.
LG Velvet has a much more vibrant screen than Galaxy Z Flip 7 (Rumored), because it has a little bit larger display. LG Velvet features a very superior storage capacity to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Galaxy Z Flip 7 (Rumored), because although it has less internal storage, it also counts with a slot for an SD memory card that supports up to 1,95 TB.
LG Velvet has a much better camera than Galaxy Z Flip 7 (Rumored), although it has a back-facing camera with a lower 48 megapixels resolution and a much tinier sensor which offers a lot lower photo and video quality, they both have the same diafragm aperture. The LG Velvet features a little longer battery lifetime than Galaxy Z Flip 7 (Rumored), because it has an 8% greater battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.