Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.1 | 98.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 15 | Android 13, 12, 11, 10 |
| -- | 2020-08-21 |
| -- | 6.49 x 3.04 x 0.32 inches |
| -- | 7.34 ounces |
| -- | Mystic black, Mystic bronze and Mystic white |
| -- | Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass Victus) and Stainless steel |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 1300.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.9 inches |
| -- | 3088 x 1440 pixels |
| Dynamic AMOLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| -- | 494 pixels per inch |
| 2600 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 4.8 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite for Galaxy SM8750-AB SM8750-AB (3 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ SM8250-AB (7 nm) chipset |
| processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 3000 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 830 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 6.21 | 9.81 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 10.00 MP | 108.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 23.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.64 inches (1/1.57") sensor | 0.75 inches (1/1.33") sensor |
| -- | 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.12 | 13.64 |
| Networks | |
| -- | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G) and LTE (4G) | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.6 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 5.92 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.3 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra has an overall score of 98.9, which is much better than the Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 7 (Rumored)'s global score of 72.1. These phones use Android operating system, but Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra has 13 version while Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 7 (Rumored) has Android 15. The Galaxy Note 20 Ultra has a much more vibrant display than Galaxy Z Flip 7 (Rumored), because it has a little bigger screen.
Galaxy Note 20 Ultra counts with a much better performing CPU than Galaxy Z Flip 7 (Rumored), and although they both have the same number of cores, the Galaxy Note 20 Ultra also has a greater amount of RAM memory. Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra takes way better photos and videos than Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 7 (Rumored), and although they both have a same size aperture, the Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra also has a lot better 108 mega pixels resolution camera in the back and a larger camera sensor providing a higher image quality.
Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra features a quite bigger memory capacity to store more apps and games than Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 7 (Rumored), because although it has 0 less internal storage capacity, it also counts with an external SD slot that supports up to 1000 GB. The Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra counts with just a bit better battery lifetime than Galaxy Z Flip 7 (Rumored), because it has 4500mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.