Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.1 | 93.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 15 | Android 11, 10, 9.0 Pie |
| -- | 2019-05-16 |
| -- | 6.40 x 3.04 x 0.31 inches |
| -- | 6.98 ounces |
| -- | Crown silver, Majestic black and Royal gold |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 342.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.7 inches |
| -- | 3040 x 1440 pixels |
| Dynamic AMOLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| -- | 502 pixels per inch |
| 2600 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 4.8 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite for Galaxy SM8750-AB SM8750-AB (3 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 chipset |
| processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 830 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 6.21 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.3 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 10.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| 23.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.64 inches (1/1.57") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| -- | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.12 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| -- | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G) and LTE (4G) | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.6 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4500mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 5.92 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.3 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy S10 5G is much better than Galaxy Z Flip 7 (Rumored), getting a overall score of 93.6 against 72.1. Both phones we are comparing here have Android OS, but Galaxy S10 5G has the older 11 version and Galaxy Z Flip 7 (Rumored) has Android 15 version. The Samsung Galaxy S10 5G features a really superior performance than Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 7 (Rumored). Both have the same RAM amount and the same number of cores.
The Samsung Galaxy S10 5G counts with a way better display than Galaxy Z Flip 7 (Rumored). They have a screen of the same size. Galaxy S10 5G has a little bit better camera than Galaxy Z Flip 7 (Rumored), because although it has a camera with much less mega pixels resolution and a much tinier back-facing camera sensor shooting way lower quality photographs, it also counts with a larger aperture for better images and videos in low-light situations.
The Samsung Galaxy S10 5G's memory to store more apps and games is very similar to the Galaxy Z Flip 7 (Rumored) one, both have equal internal storage. The Samsung Galaxy S10 5G has a little better battery performance than Galaxy Z Flip 7 (Rumored), because it has a 4500mAh battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.