Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.1 | 98 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 15 | Android 13, 12, 11, 10 |
| -- | 2020-03-06 |
| -- | 6.57 x 2.99 x 0.35 inches |
| -- | 7.83 ounces |
| -- | Cosmic black and Cosmic grey |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 1400.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.9 inches |
| -- | 3200 x 1440 pixels |
| Dynamic AMOLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| -- | 509 pixels per inch |
| 2600 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 4.8 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite for Galaxy SM8750-AB SM8750-AB (3 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 (7 nm) chipset |
| processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 830 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 6.21 | 9.72 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 10.00 MP | 108.00 MP + 40.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 23.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.64 inches (1/1.57") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| -- | 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.12 | 13.42 |
| Networks | |
| -- | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G) and LTE (4G) | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.6 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 5.92 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.3 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G is a lot better than the Galaxy Z Flip 7 (Rumored), having a global score of 98 against 72.1. Both devices in this review include Android OS (Operating System), but the Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G has the previous 13 version while Galaxy Z Flip 7 (Rumored) has Android 15 version. Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G features an extremely better CPU than Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 7 (Rumored), and although they both have 8 cores, the Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G also has more RAM memory.
Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G features an incredibly better looking screen than Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 7 (Rumored), because it has a little bit bigger display. Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G has a bigger storage capacity to store more games and applications than Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 7 (Rumored), because although it has only 128 GB internal storage capacity, it also counts with a SD memory slot that admits up to 1000 GB.
Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G features greater battery lifetime than Galaxy Z Flip 7 (Rumored), because it has a 25% more battery size. The Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G features a much better camera than Galaxy Z Flip 7 (Rumored), because although it has a much tinier back camera sensor providing a much lower image quality, and they both have a F1.8 aperture, the Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G also counts with a back camera with much more megapixels.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.