Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.1 | 79.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 15 | -- |
| -- | 2016-03-11 |
| -- | 5.61 x 2.74 x 0.31 inches |
| -- | 5.36 ounces |
| -- | Black, Gold, Pink, Pink gold, Silver and White |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 4) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 124.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 5.1 inches |
| -- | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| Dynamic AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| -- | 576 pixels per inch |
| 2600 cd/m2 brightness | 855 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 4.8 | 9.6 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite for Galaxy SM8750-AB SM8750-AB (3 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset |
| processor | Kryo, 64-bit, 14 nm (Quad-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 830 GPU | Adreno 530 GPU |
| 6.21 | 9 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 32 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 200 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 8.56 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 10.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 23.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.64 inches (1/1.57") sensor | 0.4 inches (1/2.5") sensor |
| -- | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.12 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| -- | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G) and LTE (4G) | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 5.92 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.3 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Galaxy S7 is better than the Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 7 (Rumored), getting a 79.5 score against 72.1. The Galaxy S7 features a way better processing power than Galaxy Z Flip 7 (Rumored), although it has 4 less cores (but faster) and a smaller amount of RAM. Galaxy S7 has a much sharper display than Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 7 (Rumored), although it has much more opaque screen and a lot smaller display.
The Galaxy Z Flip 7 (Rumored) has a much bigger memory to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Galaxy S7, because although it has no SD memory card expansion slot, it also counts with 256 GB internal memory capacity. The Galaxy Z Flip 7 (Rumored) has improved battery lifetime than Galaxy S7, because it has a 33% larger battery size.
Galaxy Z Flip 7 (Rumored) takes clearer photos and videos than Samsung Galaxy S7, because although it has a smaller aperture which is not recommended for shooting pictures or video in low light situations, it also counts with a lot higher 50 mega-pixels resolution back facing camera and a way bigger sensor.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.