Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 88.5 | 83.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Apple |
| Android 12, 11, 10 | iOS 15.x, 14.x, 13.x |
| 2020-02-14 | 2019-09-20 |
| 6.59 x 2.90 x 0.28 inches | 5.94 x 2.98 x 0.33 inches |
| 6.46 ounces | 6.84 ounces |
| Mirror black and Mirror purple | Black, Green, Purple, Red, White and Yellow |
| Aluminum | Aluminum and Glass |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 1380.00 | $ 699.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.1 inches |
| 2636 x 1080 pixels | 1792 x 828 pixels |
| Dynamic AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 425 pixels per inch | 324 pixels per inch |
| -- | 625 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.3 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ SM8150-AC (7 nm) chipset | Apple A13 Bionic APL1W85 (7 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2960 MHz) processor | 64-bit Lightning and Thunder, 64-bit (Hexa-Core 2650 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Apple-designed 4 core GPU |
| 9.72 | 10.35 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.3 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 12.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.23 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3110mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 5.28 | 5.12 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Galaxy Z Flip is just a bit better than the iPhone 11, getting a global score of 88.5 against 83.3. Galaxy Z Flip's construction is somewhat thinner and just a bit lighter than the iPhone 11, although they were released only a couple of months apart. Galaxy Z Flip works with Android 12 operating system, while iPhone 11 works with iOS 15.x operating system.
The Galaxy Z Flip counts with a little sharper screen than iPhone 11, because it has more pixels per inch of screen, a higher resolution of 1080 x 2636 pixels and a bit bigger screen. The iPhone 11 features a bit better processor than Galaxy Z Flip, because although it has an inferior number of slower cores and a lower amount of RAM, it also counts with a 64-bit processor.
Apple iPhone 11's camera is just as good as the camera in Samsung Galaxy Z Flip, both have a F1.8 aperture, the same video quality, the same 60 frames per second video frame rates, the same back-facing camera sensor size and a 12 mega pixels resolution camera in the back. The Samsung Galaxy Z Flip features a superior memory capacity for apps and games than Apple iPhone 11, because it has 256 GB internal memory.
Galaxy Z Flip counts with a little longer battery lifetime than Apple iPhone 11, because it has a 6 percent bigger battery size.
Although Samsung Galaxy Z Flip is a better device, it costs a lot more money than the iPhone 11, and it doesn't have such a good quality/price relation as the iPhone 11. If you are trying to save some money, you can get the iPhone 11, and give up a few features and specifications, but you will get the most with your savings.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.