Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 88.5 | 85.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Apple |
| Android 12, 11, 10 | iOS 15.x, 14.x, 13.x |
| 2020-02-14 | 2019-09-20 |
| 6.59 x 2.90 x 0.28 inches | 6.22 x 3.06 x 0.32 inches |
| 6.46 ounces | 7.97 ounces |
| Mirror black and Mirror purple | Gold, Midnight green, Silver and Space gray |
| Aluminum | Glass and Stainless steel |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 1380.00 | $ 1099.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2636 x 1080 pixels | 2688 x 1242 pixels |
| Dynamic AMOLED | OLED |
| 425 pixels per inch | 456 pixels per inch |
| -- | 800 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.3 | 9.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ SM8150-AC (7 nm) chipset | Apple A13 Bionic APL1W85 (7 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2960 MHz) processor | 64-bit Lightning and Thunder, 64-bit (Hexa-Core 2650 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Apple-designed 4 core GPU |
| 9.72 | 10.35 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.3 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 12.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.23 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3969mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 5.28 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Galaxy Z Flip is a little bit better than the Apple iPhone 11 Pro Max, having a general score of 88.5 against 85.3. The Galaxy Z Flip has Android 12 OS, while Apple iPhone 11 Pro Max comes with iOS 15.x OS. The Galaxy Z Flip is a lighter and thinner phone than the Apple iPhone 11 Pro Max, although both of them were only released 5 months apart.
The iPhone 11 Pro Max has just a bit better display than Galaxy Z Flip, because although it has a quite smaller screen, it also counts with a little higher 1242 x 2688 pixels resolution and a little bit higher amount of pixels in each inch in the display. The Galaxy Z Flip has much more memory capacity for applications and games than iPhone 11 Pro Max, because it has 192 GB more internal memory capacity.
IPhone 11 Pro Max features a bit faster processor than Galaxy Z Flip, because although it has 2 less and slower cores and 4 GB lesser RAM, it also counts with a 64 bits processing unit. The iPhone 11 Pro Max's camera is just as good as the camera in Galaxy Z Flip, both of them have a back camera with a 12 mega pixels, a 0.39 inches back-facing camera sensor, the same 3840x2160 video resolution, the same 60 fps video frame rates and a same size aperture.
IPhone 11 Pro Max has greater battery lifetime than Galaxy Z Flip, because it has 3969mAh of battery capacity instead of 3300mAh.
Although Samsung Galaxy Z Flip is a better device, it costs more than the iPhone 11 Pro Max, and it doesn't have such a good quality/price relation as iPhone 11 Pro Max. If you prefer to save some money, you can get iPhone 11 Pro Max, and give up a couple features and specs, but you'll get the most out of your money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.