Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 88.5 | 92.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Apple |
| Android 12, 11, 10 | iOS 15.x, 14.x |
| 2020-02-14 | 2020-10-23 |
| 6.59 x 2.90 x 0.28 inches | 5.78 x 2.82 x 0.29 inches |
| 6.46 ounces | 6.66 ounces |
| Mirror black and Mirror purple | Gold, Graphite, Pacific blue and Silver |
| Aluminum | Glass and Stainless steel |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 1380.00 | $ 1000.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.1 inches |
| 2636 x 1080 pixels | 2532 x 1170 pixels |
| Dynamic AMOLED | OLED |
| 425 pixels per inch | 457 pixels per inch |
| -- | 1200 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.3 | 9.4 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ SM8150-AC (7 nm) chipset | Apple A14 Bionic (5 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2960 MHz) processor | 64-bit 64-bit (Hexa-Core 3100 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Yes GPU |
| 9.72 | 10.62 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.3 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 12.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.60 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.23 | 10.01 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 2815mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 5.28 | 4.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
IPhone 12 Pro is a bit better than Samsung Galaxy Z Flip, with a overall score of 92.8 against 88.5. Even being the best device in this comparison review, iPhone 12 Pro's construction is a little thicker and a bit heavier than the Samsung Galaxy Z Flip. The iPhone 12 Pro works with iOS 15.x operating system, while Samsung Galaxy Z Flip has Android 12 operating system.
Apple iPhone 12 Pro has a more vivid display than Galaxy Z Flip, because although it has a little smaller screen, it also counts with a quite better 1170 x 2532 resolution and a just a bit greater pixel amount per inch in the screen. The Galaxy Z Flip counts with a much greater storage capacity to store more apps and games than iPhone 12 Pro, because it has 256 GB internal storage.
The Apple iPhone 12 Pro features just a bit better processing power than Samsung Galaxy Z Flip, because although it has an inferior number of cores (although faster) and a smaller amount of RAM, it also counts with a 64-bits processing unit. The Samsung Galaxy Z Flip features a little bit better camera than iPhone 12 Pro, although it has a tinier aperture, they both have a 12 megapixels camera, the same video frame rate and the same 3840x2160 (4K) video definition.
Galaxy Z Flip counts with longer battery life than Apple iPhone 12 Pro, because it has 3300mAh of battery capacity.
Apple iPhone 12 Pro is not only the best devices of the ones we are comparing here, but it's also a bargain compared to the other devices, which makes this phone an obvious call.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.